
Eclectic engineer & nanoscientist. researcher @ Sandia Labs. Previously: PhD #nanoelectronics @u_psud; software startup, @stanford ugrad. also❤️ :📸 🏃 🏔 🧬
Joined March 2008
- Tweets4K
- Following1.3K
- Followers753
- Likes12.3K
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
Why neural networks learn at the edge of chaos
When you train a neural network, parameter updates aren't normally distributed. They're heavy-tailed—rare large jumps punctuate many small adjustments. This pattern appears across MLPs, CNNs, and Transformers, across MNIST and CIFAR-10, across early rapid learning and late convergence. It's suspiciously universal.
Xin-Ya Zhang and Chao Tang argue this isn't a quirk of stochastic gradient descent or mini-batch noise. It's a signature of self-organized criticality, emerging from a fundamental trade-off: the maximum entropy principle pushes the network to explore freely, while a mutual information constraint forces updates to remain task-relevant. Balance these two forces, and you get power-law statistics—the same scaling behavior seen in earthquakes, neuronal avalanches, and financial markets.
The evidence is compelling. The power-law exponent stays remarkably stable throughout training, even as loss drops by orders of magnitude. The loss landscape itself shows multiscale structure: exponential smoothness under small perturbations (locally flat basins), transitioning to power-law ruggedness at larger scales. Even the timing of large updates follows heavy-tailed statistics—big learning events cluster together rather than occurring randomly, with exponents around 2.5–2.7.
What makes this conceptually satisfying is the theoretical derivation from first principles. Starting from entropy maximization under an information constraint, and using a path-integral formulation of KL divergence through parameter space, the authors recover exactly the observed scaling behavior. No fine-tuning, no ad hoc assumptions.
The implications cut deep: neural network learning isn't just optimization—it's a nonequilibrium physical process governed by the same statistical principles that shape complex systems throughout nature. Understanding this could guide the design of more efficient learning algorithms and explain why SGD generalizes better than adaptive methods that suppress large exploratory updates.
Paper: pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pn…
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
Unlike current AI systems, brains can quickly & flexibly adapt to changing environments.
This is the topic of our perspective in Nature MI (rdcu.be/eSeif), where we relate dynamical & plasticity mechanisms in the brain to in-context & continual learning in AI. #NeuroAI
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
In Science, researchers report the observation of dendritic nanotubes in brain tissue from mice and humans. The discovery suggests that the current understanding of the brain’s organization may be incomplete, overlooking a hidden layer of connectivity.
Learn more in a new #SciencePerspective: scim.ag/3KFW8Ep
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
In this new paper, led by @giovannimarchet, we present a unique theoretical result that provides guarantees for the concrete representational structure expected to emerge in a learning system
Glad to announce our new preprint with C. Hillar, D. Kragic, and @naturecomputes !
arxiv.org/abs/2312.08550
We show via group theory how Fourier features emerge in invariant neural networks -- a step towards a mathematical understanding of representational universality. 🧵1/n
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
Paper: TPUv4 system has an optically reconfigurable network to assemble groups of 4x4x4 chips like legos (4x4x12? 16x16x16?). SparseCores help w/ embeddings. TPUv4 outperforms TPUv3 by 2.1x & perf/W by 2.7x, & has 4096 chips so ~10x faster overall.
.arxiv.org/abs/2304.01433#
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
Part of iopscience.iop.org/journal/2…, this topical review from @UT_Dallas, @UTAustin, @usal & @SandiaLabs looks at magnetic topological soliton-based computing systems, highlighting logical and neuromorphic computing with magnetic domain walls and skyrmions.
iopscience.iop.org/article/1…
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
Our January issue is now out, featuring substrate-less nanomesh receptors, non-reciprocal acoustoelectric microwave amplifiers, and a Bayesian machine built with memristors nature.com/natelectron/volum…
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
Excited to announce that our work, Progress Measures for Grokking via Mechanistic Interpretability, has been accepted as a spotlight at ICLR 23! (despite being rejected from Arxiv twice!)
This was significantly refined from my prior work, thoughts in 🧵
arxiv.org/abs/2301.05217
I've spent the past few months exploring @OpenAI's grokking result through the lens of mechanistic interpretability. I fully reverse engineered the modular addition model, and looked at what it does when training. So what's up with grokking? A 🧵... (1/17) alignmentforum.org/posts/N6W…
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
I gave a keynote last month at MAIN educational on the future of neuroAI, recording now available youtube.com/watch?v=-Gci9mkR…
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
My seCReT master plan to achieve #NeuralSupremacy is out! rdcu.be/c0J6s
I would like to thank my editors at Nature, Luke Fleet, Karl Ziemelis, and Christiana Varnava; my referees, Dilip Vasudevan and four anonymous experts; my writing coach, @whatishealth21;
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
Discover our memristor-based Bayesian machine, just published in @NatureElectron ! This is our first completely integrated hybrid memristor/CMOS system, featuring 16 small memristor arrays and >30k transistors nature.com/articles/s41928-0… @C2N_com @INSIS_CNRS @UnivParisSaclay (1/4)
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
The mind is just the current thought, the body is the current sensation, the world is the current perception.
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
The fact we automated human creativity before manual drudgery is fascinating. It is almost enough to make you believe in a teleology of technology: this was contrary to everyone's intentions, but maybe human intentions don't matter, because technology has a purpose of its own.
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
The brain has true random number generators everywhere.
Our computers don't.
What if they did?
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/…
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
I asked #Galactica about some things I know about and I'm troubled. In all cases, it was wrong or biased but sounded right and authoritative. I think it's dangerous. Here are a few of my experiments and my analysis of my concerns. (1/9)
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
Convolutional structure learned from scratch in fully connected neural networks. A tale of non-gaussianity and cumulant tensors. Our work is now out in #PNAS. A fruitful ICTP-SISSA collaboration with @sebastiangoldt. pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.22…
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
Our latest research on a new edge AI chip has just been published in
@Nature :
nature.com/articles/s41586-0…
The chip can run #AI tasks at a small fraction of the energy consumed by today's AI chips, allowing AI to be run on tiny "edge" devices like smart wearables and drones.
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
I am delighted to announce that a draft of my latest book, “Probabilistic Machine Learning: Advanced Topics”, is now available online at probml.ai. It covers #DeepGenerativeModels, #BayesianInference, #Causality, #ReinforcementLearning, #DistributionShift, etc.































