
CEO @gCaptain | US Merchant Marine | Ship Captain | Pentagon Press | Author: Fire on the Horizon | Shipbuilder | Blacklisted by Wikipedia | K5HIP 🇺🇸
Great Barrington, MA
Joined May 2007
- Tweets12K
- Following3.6K
- Followers159K
- Likes343K
Pinned Tweet
Just returned from the Annapolis Sailboat Show. Here’s the good, the bad, and the ugly.
The good: A fantastic weekend. I’m preparing my Tanton 43 for a serious ocean voyage, and the best part was having real experts at the booths who could answer tough technical questions.
The people, yachts, and setting were excellent. The rest was depressing.
I’ve attended this show since the ’90s, and it keeps shrinking. It’s still substantial, with specialists in almost every field, but the depth of competition is disappearing.
Only three diesel manufacturers had dedicated booths. Major names like Volvo Penta and Westerbeke were absent. My favorite, Beta Marine, displayed four engines, but hardly its full lineup.
Mercury and Suzuki were missing, too, although new electric outboard brands showed up.
The clientele looked far wealthier than 30 years ago. The middle class has either left sailing or can no longer afford major upgrades to aging boats.
The ugly: Sailboat sales are tanking.
Of the 40,000+ new boats sold in the wealthiest country on Earth last year, fewer than 400 were sailboats.
Used prices are collapsing, too. Weeks ago I shared one of my five dream yachts, now listed for $89,000. A few years back it would have commanded hundreds of thousands.
I’ve seen gorgeous, well-maintained bluewater yachts from the ’70s through ’90s for $20,000–$30,000, and newer yachts from the 2000s and 2010s for $60,000–$80,000 if you know where to look.
Why? Insurance restrictions, marinas filled by the COVID buying boom, rising costs, and fewer people with time to learn to sail.
Those with spare time increasingly prefer turning a key on a powerboat and going.
Catamarans are propping up the market, but insurance and dockage for that beam are outrageous. With two big engines and tiny sails, many feel more like powerboats with masts.
But the deeper problem is design. Everything looks dated. We are LONG overdue for a revolution.
1960s: Fiberglass transforms boatbuilding.
1970s: Robert Perry and others develop capable new offshore hulls.
1980s: Taiwanese yards deliver gorgeous teak interiors and craftsmanship.
1990s: Racing innovations make cruising boats faster.
2000s: Wide sterns create generous deck space.
2010s: Lighter interiors and large windows make boats faster, brighter, roomier.
Since then? Precious little.
I remember visiting Disney in the ’90s in our Ford Taurus. Its rounded windows and digital dashboard felt futuristic, but Tomorrowland looked decades old.
My dad called it “the future from the ’70s.”
That’s exactly how this boat show felt.
Even multimillion-dollar Swans and Oysters had rounded edges, ugly oversized windows, and millennial-gray interiors. Giant screens and TVs everywhere, as if we go sailing for MORE screen time.
Those windows were exciting 15 years ago. Now LEDs can brighten a cabin without turning it into a glass box.
Who wants to spend a million dollars on a floating Hilton Home2 Suites?
I boarded a $2.5 million yacht with flimsy plastic hatches that looked ready to blow out in the first 20-foot wave. When I challenged the salesman, he lectured me about eco-friendly materials and saving diesel through weight reduction. 🙄
Give us fast, computer-designed hulls, not cost-cutting eco-trash dressed up in six shades of gray.
The cure is simple: Use modern engineering to build boats that are rugged, fast, and classically beautiful.
We don’t want plastic. We want brass. Figure out how to 3D-print it.
We don’t want an iPad holder. Give us a proper place for a sextant.
We don’t want a 60-inch TV. Give us a better dodger, built with advanced clear materials, so we can sit outside, protected, and enjoy the actual ocean.
Stop designing floating hotel rooms. Start building yachts that make people dream of going to sea.
Harden the lines, engineer quality, lower the cost of luxury, use natural instead of eco materials. Make a model nornies can afford.
Call me. I’ll design the next gen yacht!
My aunt found a box of letters my dad sent home from Vietnam. Every night before bed, he wrote his mother a long letter.
He was a medic who flew some pretty hairy missions, so I expected mud-stained pages, crumpled paper, and barely legible handwriting.
Nope. Every letter is pristine, written in meticulous penmanship.
Then I remembered: Dad wasn’t a Navy corpsman embedded with the Marines.
He was AIR FORCE. 💀
I have absolutely no doubt that while bullets were whizzing by in a hot LZ, Dad was yelling at wounded guys to hurry the F up and load the bird so he could get back to his air-conditioned bunk in time for dinner.
Nothing strikes the fear of God into me like my wife sleeping late.
If I don’t wake her and she’s late for work, I’m dead.
But there’s a good chance she told me she has the day off and I wasn’t listening.
If I wake her then, they’ll never find my body.
John Ʌ Konrad V retweeted
My favorite part is that in order to get rid of the 2nd Amendment you have to first get rid of the 2nd Amendment.
John Ʌ Konrad V retweeted
I just caught up on some of the recent posts from @DataRepublican, and they’re chilling—not primarily because they outline a violent uprising, but because they reveal a strategy of manufacturing a constitutional crisis in which states declare the federal government illegitimate. What’s alarming is the sheer ignorance and hubris of the people treating this as a workable path. They appear to believe such a rupture can be contained or directed, yet they show little understanding of either American history or the practical consequences of delegitimizing the federal order.
The people driving this approach are largely led by academics who have never borne responsibility for real-world outcomes, military officers who couldn’t produce a coherent strategy to win a twenty-year war, and former intelligence officials whose records inspire little confidence. They seem prepared to sacrifice institutional stability—and the young idealists who would be drawn into the resulting chaos—while remaining safely removed from the fallout themselves.
What they fail to grasp is that the Constitution is not merely a set of rules that can be voided by state declaration. It is bound to the oaths of those sworn to defend it and to the habits of a population raised on the Bill of Rights. America is not Europe, China, or any other society in which a central authority can be nullified with limited resistance. Attempts to engineer a crisis of legitimacy will not remain a matter of legal posturing. They will collide with people who take their oaths seriously, and the resulting contest over authority is unlikely to stay bloodless.
The American Civil War remains the deadliest conflict in U.S. history. Roughly 2% of the population died—men, women, and children—in what was, by historical standards, a relatively conventional war fought between uniformed armies. Scaled to today’s population, that figure approaches 7.5 million dead. A modern breakdown in which states and the federal government treat one another as illegitimate would almost certainly be worse: a grinding conflict fought in neighborhoods, towns, and cities, where the line between friend and enemy would be unclear and ordinary life would become impossible. Anyone of consequence would carry a target, and trust would collapse.
This is not a call for violence. It is a plea to avoid the conditions that make violence probable. Many of us have seen what war actually does, and we understand the cost that would be imposed on the next generation because some believe their preferred political outcome can be forced by creating a crisis of legitimacy. Trump leaves office in two years. If the goal is to alter the constitutional order, the Framers already provided the mechanism for doing so. Use it. Do not manufacture a crisis that invites states to treat the federal government as illegitimate while others pay the price.
As Sherman put it: “It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, more vengeance, more desolation. War is hell.”
“As Sherman put it: It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, more vengeance, more desolation. War is hell.”
I just caught up on some of the recent posts from @DataRepublican, and they’re chilling—not primarily because they outline a violent uprising, but because they reveal a strategy of manufacturing a constitutional crisis in which states declare the federal government illegitimate. What’s alarming is the sheer ignorance and hubris of the people treating this as a workable path. They appear to believe such a rupture can be contained or directed, yet they show little understanding of either American history or the practical consequences of delegitimizing the federal order.
The people driving this approach are largely led by academics who have never borne responsibility for real-world outcomes, military officers who couldn’t produce a coherent strategy to win a twenty-year war, and former intelligence officials whose records inspire little confidence. They seem prepared to sacrifice institutional stability—and the young idealists who would be drawn into the resulting chaos—while remaining safely removed from the fallout themselves.
What they fail to grasp is that the Constitution is not merely a set of rules that can be voided by state declaration. It is bound to the oaths of those sworn to defend it and to the habits of a population raised on the Bill of Rights. America is not Europe, China, or any other society in which a central authority can be nullified with limited resistance. Attempts to engineer a crisis of legitimacy will not remain a matter of legal posturing. They will collide with people who take their oaths seriously, and the resulting contest over authority is unlikely to stay bloodless.
The American Civil War remains the deadliest conflict in U.S. history. Roughly 2% of the population died—men, women, and children—in what was, by historical standards, a relatively conventional war fought between uniformed armies. Scaled to today’s population, that figure approaches 7.5 million dead. A modern breakdown in which states and the federal government treat one another as illegitimate would almost certainly be worse: a grinding conflict fought in neighborhoods, towns, and cities, where the line between friend and enemy would be unclear and ordinary life would become impossible. Anyone of consequence would carry a target, and trust would collapse.
This is not a call for violence. It is a plea to avoid the conditions that make violence probable. Many of us have seen what war actually does, and we understand the cost that would be imposed on the next generation because some believe their preferred political outcome can be forced by creating a crisis of legitimacy. Trump leaves office in two years. If the goal is to alter the constitutional order, the Framers already provided the mechanism for doing so. Use it. Do not manufacture a crisis that invites states to treat the federal government as illegitimate while others pay the price.
As Sherman put it: “It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, more vengeance, more desolation. War is hell.”
Alright, gentlemen, here’s how to answer the question, “Who’s your celebrity crush?”
The trick is to pick a woman you’re not remotely attracted to. Preferably someone older.
Then go ALL IN.
Talk about how she’s the most beautiful woman alive. How you’d leave everything behind for her. How you’ve been hopelessly in love since the moment you first laid eyes on her. Defend her beauty with the conviction of a medieval knight defending his queen.
The more ridiculous the mismatch, the funnier it gets.
Mine is Sandra Bullock. Occasionally, when I want to keep things spicy, I switch to Cher. Keeps the wife guessing.
PRO TIP: Once a year, wait until your wife is coming home from a long day at work. Get comfortable on the couch, preferably under a blanket, and put on the absolute worst Sandra Bullock movie you can find.
When she walks in, don’t even look up. Just sigh wistfully and say, “God, she’s magnificent.”
There are few things more alarming to a hardworking wife than finding her husband lounging on the couch watching a terrible romantic comedy.
Bonus points if you whisper, “We could’ve been happy together, Sandy.”
P.S. After twenty years of this joke I have gaslighted myself into actually having a small crush on Sandra.
John Ʌ Konrad V retweeted
So, this is a copy of which nation's design?
China's first domestically developed high-power podded propulsor designed for polar icebreaking vessels rolled off the production line in Shanghai on Tuesday.
Often described as the "heart" of polar vessels, the 10-megawatt podded propulsor is expected to arrive at a European shipyard in late November before being installed on a vessel in February 2027. It can operate at 160% of its rated torque under icebreaking conditions and break through ice up to 2.1 m thick, including 20 cm of snow cover. Its all-electric propulsion system and 360-degree rotating design enable icebreaking in both forward and reverse directions.
John Ʌ Konrad V retweeted
Hey @JBPritzker!
What are you doing hanging around with the National Security Leaders for America (NSL4A)?
Are you part of their plot to launch a Color Revolution in America by creating a "legitimacy crisis" after the midterms where Democrat governors declare our duly-elected President "illegitimate" so those same Democrat governors can assert themselves as the only "legitimate" authority representing the United States of America?
(Full article link below.)
John Ʌ Konrad V retweeted
Replying to @HiddenHistoryYT
Hmmm…..
Was at a Mall with my nephew. Saw a group of getto thugs. Also saw a guy with a WWII Merchant Marine hat.
I stopped him and asked about his service. Torpedoed twice, survived the water, went on the next convoy.
Asked nephew who was the real tough guy, gangbanger or him?
Live by the sword, die by the sword.
Those who pick fights with me should understand that I will find out who is really pulling the strings and come for them, not just their puppets …
Capitol agenda: Dem gavels are coming for Elon Musk politi.co/4dPcGpd
Everyone agrees that difficult hard times make you stronger.
Most agree that the most difficult times in our lives were the happiest.
Why doesn’t anyone see that marriage is hard for a reason?
Because it makes you stronger and happier.
“A woman wondering if they can do better than her current husband, the answer is always yes."
This might be the most evil thing I’m seen all month.
Your wife cannot find someone better than you. You cannot find someone better than your wife.
Can you find someone smarter, better looking, smarter or richer?
To have sex with? Probably.
To build a life with? Maybe. Big if.
But the entire point of marriage is a loving stable platform ordered toward your mutual good and that of your children.
Marriage is not about happiness. It’s for providing the platform to which you can become happy and much much more.
And this is a very dangerous time in world history to get divorced.
Divorce seems like a safe option because we just had the greatest period of wealth, peace and stability the world has ever seen.
But the world without peace, wealth and stability is a very dangerous and hostile place. For both men and women.
I therefore find it ironic that the people on the left who keep crying the sky is falling are the very ones promoting divorce.
If the sky truly is falling then you need to stabilize the foundation of your life and repair that leaking roof NOW. Not abandon it.
If the sky isn’t falling then the best you can do is reset the clock and start rebuilding that foundation and house with someone else.
What they won’t tell you is that’s a lot of work. You have to be a idiot to want to start from scratch in middle age. I don’t want to do that. Building is hard. I want to enjoy the fruits of my labor and wealth and knowledge from the shelter of a loving marriage that sure as hell ain’t perfect but has depth and richness and great big load bearing beams we carved out of oak and hauled into place with great sweat, work and tears.
Life is too short to abandon all you built and start over with someone who is needy too.
John Ʌ Konrad V retweeted
Replying to @johnkonrad
"We're going that way"
There’s a point where most everyone grows up and realizes it's all on you and nobody is going to do it for you. Your ambition finds a gear and life really begins. This guy has passed that point. Turning losers into winners; a life's quest.
“A woman wondering if they can do better than her current husband, the answer is always yes."
This might be the most evil thing I’m seen all month.
Your wife cannot find someone better than you. You cannot find someone better than your wife.
Can you find someone smarter, better looking, smarter or richer?
To have sex with? Probably.
To build a life with? Maybe. Big if.
But the entire point of marriage is a loving stable platform ordered toward your mutual good and that of your children.
Marriage is not about happiness. It’s for providing the platform to which you can become happy and much much more.
And this is a very dangerous time in world history to get divorced.
Divorce seems like a safe option because we just had the greatest period of wealth, peace and stability the world has ever seen.
But the world without peace, wealth and stability is a very dangerous and hostile place. For both men and women.
I therefore find it ironic that the people on the left who keep crying the sky is falling are the very ones promoting divorce.
If the sky truly is falling then you need to stabilize the foundation of your life and repair that leaking roof NOW. Not abandon it.
If the sky isn’t falling then the best you can do is reset the clock and start rebuilding that foundation and house with someone else.
What they won’t tell you is that’s a lot of work. You have to be a idiot to want to start from scratch in middle age. I don’t want to do that. Building is hard. I want to enjoy the fruits of my labor and wealth and knowledge from the shelter of a loving marriage that sure as hell ain’t perfect but has depth and richness and great big load bearing beams we carved out of oak and hauled into place with great sweat, work and tears.
Life is too short to abandon all you built and start over with someone who is needy too.
Panama Canal Traffic and Tonnage Rise Despite El Niño Challenges gcaptain.com/panama-canal-tr…
John Ʌ Konrad V retweeted
I really hate how smug academics use "political demonstrations" to describe the revolutionary and insurrectionary violence they support, and then use terms like extremist and "anti-democratic" for those they oppose.
Narrative is a part of the battle that you have to win.























