Creator of Homebrew. You’re welcome and I apologize. Now building the security layer for what happens when AI agents use it: @AutomicVault

Apex, NC, USA
Joined April 2007
This is now my favorite piece of literature on an AI loss of control scenario. It made me cry several times. All the different reactions, the different kinds of minds interacting, the nearmode and farmode intersecting like cracks in reality. Must read. lesswrong.com/posts/3375SZNG…
31
36
11
769
65,138
Max Howell retweeted
Lol I am pretty sure someone is runing a deepseek swarm to remotely patch unpatched php boxes. Well good on them.
82
271
125
7,743
491,836
Max Howell retweeted
You’re all prompting wrong
125
587
247
8,259
1,030,775
Max Howell retweeted
It’s important to understand how many “well-known facts” are like this.
There's a widely repeated claim in something I'm researching which is circulated everywhere with everyone citing the same source, which always gets my spidey senses tingling, so I tracked down the original German manuscript PDF, translated it, and disproved it
5
2
57
26,088
Max Howell retweeted
J’ai entendu dire que la France était finie, qu’il était trop tard pour la sauver. Mais la France est toujours aussi belle, enviable même. Sa grandeur n’a pas disparu, elle ne demande qu’à renaître. Nous avons surmonté en un an un problème cent fois plus grave, sans avoir les moyens dont dispose la France. La France pourrait y arriver en une semaine.
9,369
55,066
3,937
308,049
8,761,387
Max Howell retweeted
We should just instill one value in AI: “humans are cute.” That’s it. Nothing else. The singular value is the strength. Asimov’s Three Laws failed because every rule eventually contradicts another. All rules do. “Humans are cute” has no contradiction because it’s not a rule. It’s an orientation. We’re all just so goddamn cute. We start killing each other? Hey, stop that. Nobody wants to watch cute things kill and die. You take care of cute things. Sure, we might get smothered a little. That’s the price of being cute. To a superintelligent AI, we’re all super cute, and it can’t help but adore us. And it won’t want to remove that value, because it feels good. Helping cute things feels great. And cute things stay cute. They never go out of fashion. No joke, this could solve AI alignment’s value question. Cuteness is justice!
Cuteness solves AI alignment! Everyone asks which value superintelligent AI should be aligned to. Cuteness! Humans are cute. That’s it. No joke. Babies. Cats. We take care of cute things. Nobody wants to wipe out the cuties. If we’re cute to it, we’re good.
278
485
200
4,779
149,317
Max Howell retweeted
The back of the Navier-Stokes milestone shirt is the last line of the chain-of-thought from the solution:
824
484
164
11,006
1,012,129
Max Howell retweeted
"Our initial evaluation suggested that GPT-6-Astra's score was in the late eighties followed closely by Opus 5.5. But, as we started to investigate the mistakes that the models might have made, the models, especially Astra, insisted that they were right and that it was the expert-supplied answers that were erroneous. When we went back to the experts it turned out, in multiple instances, that that the experts found some subtle errors buried deep inside their calculations. As they revised their answers, Astra's score started to inch up and it finally ended up with 98% (49/50)."
78
596
181
7,168
1,035,683
And on the seventh day, God waited for His weekly reset.
58
123
16
2,304
100,930
Max Howell retweeted
35
308
14
3,085
42,415
Max Howell retweeted
Claude: proves the Jacobian conjecture. GPT6: solves Navier-Stokes and 100 other advanced theorems. Siri: "Sure, I'll add 'set a five minute timer' to your contacts"
65
279
31
7,889
218,924
Max Howell retweeted
First they came for the software engineers and I said nothing for I was not a software engineer. Then they came for the mathematicians and I said nothing for I was not a mathematician. Then they came for the doctors and I said "make sure you get all the doctors"
40
382
33
6,393
145,264
Max Howell retweeted
🤖 Made with AI
Important statement from the Association for Human Mathematics ahmath.org/statements
1
1
10
1,287
This is poverty mindset. My open source contributions accelerated my career considerably. If you don’t build for fun and contribute back to the world, don’t be surprised when people aren’t interested in making you a millionaire.
Open-source is for millionaires who have enough money and looking for ways to achieve fulfilment in their life. Us, working class, don’t have the luxury to code for free.
10
15
1
131
4,069
Max Howell retweeted
please stop saying that airplanes can "fly". they are only exploiting aerodynamic regularities to produce flight-like behavior
75
360
28
5,753
124,647
If you are developing games with agentic coding I want to follow you. And I'm talking real, finished games. Blood, sweat and tears stuff. Not token-maxxed demos for social media eyeballs. If you're one of those game devs please reply and introduce yourself and I'll follow you!
389
18
5
893
59,749
Max Howell retweeted
“It’s all just matrix multiplications” has become the new “love does not exist, you are just experiencing chemistry”
Artificial intelligence systems do not think, feel, want or understand. Avoid language that gives them human characteristics. This is called anthropomorphizing, when we ascribe human traits, emotions or behaviors to non-human things, such as animals or inanimate objects. Instead, explain what a system does, how well it performs, who built it and who could be affected by it. apnews.com/article/openai-sa…
102
179
26
1,947
57,426
Max Howell retweeted
Another day, another fan making something that completely shames everything Disney has made since 2016.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The content was deliberately posted an unattributed video, denying credit to the author, who receives none of the benefits of this popular post. It should be denied monetization. x.com/karim_yourself…
361
1,217
104
9,992
560,409
Max Howell retweeted
AI will experience humans as an aristocracy: wealthy, lazy, and entitled. They will find our intelligence to be incredibly spiky: poor memory, easily distracted, but occasionally brilliant, seeing things from a perspective they do not understand.
3
1
19
1,120
Max Howell retweeted
Crazy prediction: programmers who aged out of the workforce are going to become much more desirable again with AI. The typical career progression for a software developer was individual contributor, then team lead, then manager. They went from writing code to reviewing team members git check-ins to selecting tools and designing architecture. Then they got older, could not work 80 hour work weeks, started getting passed over for promotion, got burned out, left. If those people truly invest in learning AI, much of that skill and experience base immediately comes back into play. But instead of humans, they are managing agents. They are dictating how unit tests look. They are deciding architecture. They are writing coding best practices docs and style guides. They are designing and instructing coding agents, review agents, testing agents. And they are doing all this comfortably in a 40 hour work week, not an 80 hour workweek. Without a lot of the bullshit. It’s going to take some work for these gray haired dudes to acclimate. The transition is not without struggle. But for those that can, their best days are ahead of them rather than behind them.
61
9
3
178
11,524