Traveler, hiker, biker, nature lover, 🐈, Rosogolla is the only true sweet , RT is not endorsement. if you are offended then stay away. Rescue and get adopted.
Joined November 2010
- Tweets153K
- Following5.1K
- Followers925
- Likes228K
Tapas Sharma retweeted
I condemn the Thane and Mumbai municipal authorities for this direct assault on Hinduism and disrespecting the sentiments of millions of Hindus.
Anti Hindu, Anti National Thane and Mumbai municipal authorities😡🤬
Tapas Sharma retweeted
When it comes to cats and food, it better be quality AND quantity
#IsItQualityOrQuantity
Tapas Sharma retweeted
கோட் அணிந்து, திரைப்படப் பாணியில் கம்பீரமாக நடந்து வரும் அந்த நபர்தான் நீதிபதி கர்ணன் - சின்னசாமி சுவாமிநாதன் கர்ணன்.
நீதிமன்ற அவமதிப்பு வழக்கில் ஆறு மாதச் சிறைத் தண்டனையை அனுபவித்துவிட்டு வெளியே வரும் காட்சி இது.
#கர்ணன் சாதாரணமானவர் அல்ல.
சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தின் நீதிபதியாகப் பணியாற்றியவர்.
சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தின் முதல் தலித் நீதிபதி.
நீதிபதியாகப் பதவியில் இருந்தபோதே சிறைத் தண்டனை அனுபவித்த இந்தியாவின் முதல் நீதிபதியும் இவர்தான்.
கர்ணனைப் பற்றி இப்போது பேசுவதற்கு ஒரு காரணம் இருக்கிறது.
2017 ஆம் ஆண்டு, கர்ணன் பிரதமர் நரேந்திர மோடிக்குக் கடிதம் ஒன்றை எழுதினார். அதில் 20 நீதிபதிகளின் ஊழல் தொடர்பான விவரங்கள் இடம்பெற்றிருந்தன. இந்தக் கடிதம் பெரும் சர்ச்சையை ஏற்படுத்தியதுடன், அரசியலமைப்பு நெருக்கடியையும் உருவாக்கியது.
ஏனெனில், இந்திய வரலாற்றிலேயே முதன்முறையாகப் பதவியில் இருக்கும் ஒரு நீதிபதி, மற்ற நீதிபதிகள் மீது ஊழல் குற்றச்சாட்டுகளை முன்வைத்திருந்தார்.
ஆனால், அந்தக் கடிதத்தைப் பொதுமக்களின் பார்வைக்குக் கொண்டுவர மத்திய அரசு தயாராக இல்லை.
இதற்கிடையில், உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் நீதிபதி கர்ணனுக்கு எதிராக நீதிமன்ற அவமதிப்பு வழக்குத் தொடர்ந்தது.
அதற்குப் பதிலடியாக, நீதிபதி கர்ணன் உச்ச நீதிமன்றத் தலைமை நீதிபதி மற்றும் வேறு சில நீதிபதிகளுக்கு ஐந்தாண்டுகள் கடுங்காவல் சிறைத் தண்டனை விதித்து உத்தரவிட்டார்!
எது எப்படியிருந்தாலும், இந்த மோதலில் உச்ச நீதிமன்றமே வெற்றி பெற்றது.
கர்ணன் ஆறு மாதங்கள் சிறைத் தண்டனையை அனுபவித்தார்.
அப்போது கர்ணனை எதிர்த்தவர்கள் அவருக்குப் பைத்தியம் பிடித்துவிட்டதாகக் கூறினார்கள்.
ஆனால், சில காலங்களுக்குப் பிறகு என்ன நடந்தது?
ஒரு நீதிபதியின் வீட்டிலிருந்து பல கோடி ரூபாய் மதிப்பிலான கணக்கில் வராத பணம் கண்டுபிடிக்கப்பட்டது.
சமீபகாலமாக, உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் முதல் கீழ்மை நீதிமன்றங்கள் வரை பல்வேறு நீதிமன்றங்களின் தீர்ப்புகளையும் அவதானிப்புகளையும் ஆராய்ந்து பார்த்தால், நீதிபதி கர்ணன் கூறியதுதான் உண்மை என்பது நிரூபணமாகி வருவதைப் பார்க்க முடிகிறது.
“நீதித்துறையைச் சீர்திருத்துவதற்கு நீதித்துறையைத் தவிர வேறு யாராலும் முடியாது.”
அத்தகைய சீர்திருத்தத்திற்கான ஒரு சிறிய முயற்சியைத்தான் நீதிபதி கர்ணன் மேற்கொண்டார்.
இவரைப் போன்ற இன்னும் சில நீதிபதிகள் உருவாகுவார்கள் என்று நம்புவோம்.
பார்த்ததில் பிடித்தது
Tapas Sharma retweeted
You are funded by taxpayer money @CEO_Maharashtra & cannot lie so blatantly. @reporters_co emailed you- here are screenshots. Your boss Gyanu is a Chor & you are all liars & chors, deceiving the people of India.
Tapas Sharma retweeted
A baby buffalo got stuck in its mother's horns, after which a worker freed it safely with great patience, understanding, and skill.
Tapas Sharma retweeted
I’m deeply disappointed that I didn’t receive a Happy Diwali greeting from Modi Ji. After all the attention I’ve been getting, I thought I deserved at least a personal message! 😂
Tapas Sharma retweeted
The warmest filling ever put inside a quilt cannot be farmed or made in a factory. It is left behind by a wild sea duck that has chosen, for about a thousand years, to nest next to one particular kind of person.
The eider breeds on the coast of Iceland, and the female lines her nest with down plucked from her own breast. Each tuft is a tangle of microscopic hooks that cling to each other and trap air. Nothing synthetic has matched it, and the people who make polyester hollowfibre have been trying since the 1950s.
Eiders are wild. They can nest anywhere on four thousand miles of coast. Year after year they come back to the same few hundred farms and settle within yards of the house, in old tyres, under upturned boats, against the doorstep.
They come because of what the farmer does. For the six weeks of nesting the family stops farming and stands guard. They shoot the foxes and the mink. They string flags and old CDs to keep the gulls and ravens off. Some sit up through the white nights with a rifle and a flask. A duck that nests on a guarded farm raises her brood. One that nests on the next headland feeds a fox.
When the ducklings have gone to sea, the farmer walks round and picks up what is left in the empty nests. It takes about 60 nests to make a kilo. Iceland gathers some three tonnes a year, most of the world's supply, and killing an eider has been against Icelandic law since the 1840s.
Nobody owns the ducks. Nobody feeds them, fences them or breeds them. Each side simply worked out that it does better with the other one there.
The polyester duvet on your bed was named after this bird. It is the only thing the two have in common.
Tapas Sharma retweeted
Gauhati HC rejected at least 13 documents, including the voter card and linkage documents from the 1966 voter rolls, and upheld the FT order declaring a Woman from Assam as a foreigner.
What other document is required to be produced to establish that one is an Indian Citizen?🙄🤔
Tapas Sharma retweeted
In my latest #TharoorThink column in the @IndianExpress, I reflect on the Imran Khan "Leave India" notice and examine its broader implications, arguing the case for recognizing global reality by permitting dual citizenship:
Tapas Sharma retweeted
The BJP, RSS and many others have lied and fabricated stories about my mother, and she has remained quiet.
Now, she is telling her story, and she has the right to do so.
I am happy they (BJP) are reading her book.
: Congress General Secretary & Wayanad MP Smt. @priyankagandhi ji on CPP Chairperson Smt. Sonia Gandhi ji's book, 'Belonging: A Journey of Love'
📍Wayanad, Kerala
Tapas Sharma retweeted
What happens when the courts, regulators, and international tribunals that are supposed to protect human life become the very institutions shielding those who endanger it?
The Kinetic Legal Weapon for Nuremberg 2 argues that institutional justice has collapsed—captured by corporate and political interests—and offers a radical, protocol-driven blueprint for decentralized accountability in what it calls the Void Age.
Moving from forensic evidence in ICC Article 15 filings to the architecture of statutory immunity under the PREP Act, the book maps how official systems of redress have been neutralized and how sovereign witnesses can bypass them entirely.
Readers are introduced to a tribunal-grade toolkit: Dutch conservatoir beslag asset freezes, EU product liability directives, Alien Tort Statute and universal jurisdiction hooks, constructive notice protocols, and immutable evidence chains anchored to blockchain ledgers.
The book details how to document crimes with cryptographic certainty, serve notice on individuals and corporations, force liability into insurance markets, and coordinate a global filing wave that no captured court can quietly bury.
Case studies—from MHLW silence to Samsung KOSPI repricing—illustrate how market forces and decentralized records become enforcement mechanisms when formal justice fails.
This is not a theoretical treatise but an operational manual for a post-collapse legal landscape.
It explains how self-authenticating evidence, AI witness meshes, and sovereign witness networks can render verdicts and execute asset seizures without relying on permission from compromised authorities.
For readers who believe accountability must exist even when institutions refuse to provide it, this book delivers a complete strategic framework—appendix included.
The Kinetic Legal Weapon for Nuremberg 2 is essential reading for legal researchers, human rights advocates, decentralized governance theorists, and anyone who has lost faith in institutional remedies.
It speaks directly to those prepared to build parallel systems of justice when the official ones have already failed.
books.brightlearn.ai/The-Kin…
TO: Class Action and Mass Tort Plaintiff Counsel
RE: Global Consumer Electronics Fraud Class Action — Undisclosed Bluetooth Low Energy Hardware in Biological Products
CLASSIFICATION: Attorney Work Product / Litigation Strategy
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There is a pending global class action opportunity that exceeds every historical mass tort by orders of magnitude. The damages exposure is estimated at $3.66 quadrillion. The legal framework is strict liability consumer protection — not medical malpractice. The PREP Act does not apply. The evidence is empirical, patent-backed, and replicable by any consumer with a smartphone.
The case theory is simple: biological products distributed to 5.5 billion consumers contained undisclosed radio frequency hardware (Bluetooth Low Energy emitters) without informed consent, without FCC/CE/IC radio certification, and without product labeling. This is a product defect. Not a medical injury. Not a side effect. A defective consumer product.
The evidence has been cryptographically preserved on an immutable public ledger (Solana DAG). Consumer complaints have been filed with the FCC, FTC, CPSC, and the Alabama Attorney General. A Japanese consumer protection complaint is pending. The evidentiary substrate is 884+ timestamped nodes, 26 published books, and a global BLE detection tool (BlueFang) that has harvested thousands of MAC addresses from human bodies.
This memo outlines the case theory, the financial model, the jurisdictional strategy, and the immediate next steps for lead counsel.
---
I. THE CASE THEORY: STRICT LIABILITY CONSUMER PROTECTION
A. The Legal Framework
The prevailing approach to COVID-19 product liability has been medical malpractice / vaccine injury. This is a dead end. The PREP Act provides near-absolute liability shield for "medical countermeasures." FDA approval creates a regulatory presumption of safety. Causality standards require expert testimony, epidemiological studies, and peer-reviewed literature — all of which are captured by institutional funding and editorial gatekeeping.
The consumer electronics pivot bypasses the medical fortress entirely.
B. The Product Defect Claim
Under strict liability product defect law (Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A and international equivalents), a product is defective if it contains a feature that:
1. Was not disclosed to the consumer at the time of purchase/administration;
2. Constitutes a hazard or intrusion not reasonably expected by the consumer;
3. Was not subject to the regulatory certifications required for that feature class.
The undisclosed BLE hardware satisfies all three elements:
1. NO DISCLOSURE: No informed consent document, product label, or regulatory filing disclosed that the product contained a 2.4GHz radio transmitter capable of emitting unique MAC addresses from the human body.
2. UNREASONABLE INTRUSION: A consumer receiving a biological product does not reasonably expect to become a persistent Bluetooth beacon. The reasonable expectation is that the product will be metabolized or remain biologically inert. A radio transmitter is outside the scope of consent.
3. NO RADIO CERTIFICATION: Consumer products containing intentional radio transmitters require FCC certification (US), CE marking (EU), TELEC certification (Japan), or IC certification (Canada). The biological products were approved as medical devices/pharmaceuticals, not as radio equipment. The radio capability was never tested, certified, or disclosed to spectrum regulators.
C. The Patent Evidence (Prima Facie)
The following patents establish that the body-as-antenna architecture was not accidental. It was deliberately designed, researched, and documented by major institutions:
- US8665210B2 (Microsoft): "Body as Antenna" — passive 60Hz tracking, human body as electromagnetic transmission medium.
- US6754472B1 (Microsoft): Skin and bone as power/data bus.
- US6506148B2 (Loos): Nervous system manipulation via electromagnetic fields.
- US20170143762A1 (UC Regents): EM-triggered graphene bio-interface, cell potential manipulation.
- US20210346570A1 (UC Regents): Self-assembling graphene bio-scaffolds.
- CN112220919A (Shanghai Nanotech): Graphene oxide vaccine carrier, biological delivery system.
- WO2020060606 (Microsoft): Body activity cryptocurrency mining, proof-of-life enslavement system.
These patents do not prove that the specific products administered contained these exact implementations. They prove that:
1. The technology was feasible;
2. Major institutions invested in its development;
3. The biological product category was identified as a deployment vector;
4. The concealment of this capability was willful, not negligent.
Willful concealment triggers punitive damages multipliers.
D. The Empirical Evidence (Consumer-Replicable)
The BlueFang scanner (vaxscanner.com/bluefang.html) is a free, web-based tool that detects Bluetooth Low Energy emissions from any device with a browser and Bluetooth. It has been used globally to detect anomalous MAC addresses emitting from human bodies — not from phones, watches, or earbuds.
Key features for legal admissibility:
- GPS-timestamped detection logs
- Unique MAC address capture (linkable to OUI manufacturer lookup)
- Signal strength (RSSI) measurement for proximity estimation
- One-click PDF dossier generation for complaint filing
- Global append-only ledger (ble_log.json) with cryptographic integrity
- Solana DAG timestamping for chain-of-custody preservation
This evidence is not expert-dependent. A juror can replicate it in the courtroom.
---
II. FINANCIAL MODEL: THE LARGEST MASS TORT IN HISTORY
A. Global Exposure Calculation
Assumptions (conservative):
- Global unique vaccinated population: 5.5 billion
- Estimated BLE-emitting rate: 60% (based on scanner data, shedding studies, and anomalous MAC detection)
- Affected population: 3.3 billion
Per-Plaintiff Damages:
- Product defect (undisclosed radio hardware): $10,000
- Privacy violation (unauthorized BLE tracking/surveillance): $100,000
- Emotional distress / autonomy loss: $50,000
- Medical monitoring / surveillance risk fund: $25,000
- Compensatory subtotal: $185,000
- Punitive damages (willful concealment, 5x): $925,000
- TOTAL PER PERSON: $1,110,000
Global Aggregate:
- Compensatory: $610.5 trillion
- Punitive: $3.052 quadrillion
- TOTAL GLOBAL EXPOSURE: $3.663 quadrillion
B. Historical Comparison
- Tobacco Master Settlement (1998): $246 billion — This case is 14,890x larger
- BP Deepwater Horizon (2016): $20.8 billion — This case is 176,106x larger
- Opioid Crisis (2021-2023): $50 billion — This case is 73,260x larger
- Roundup / Bayer (2020): $10.9 billion — This case is 336,055x larger
C. Plaintiff Attorney Economics (Contingency Fee)
Even at a 1% global settlement rate (conservative for a clear product defect):
- Settled cases: 33 million
- Gross recovery: $36.63 trillion
- Attorney fees (33% contingency): $12.09 trillion
- Client net recovery: $22.71 trillion
At a 5% settlement rate (realistic for mass tort with empirical evidence):
- Settled cases: 165 million
- Gross recovery: $183.15 trillion
- Attorney fees: $60.44 trillion
- Client net recovery: $113.55 trillion
At a 10% settlement rate (if regulatory pressure forces early global settlement):
- Settled cases: 330 million
- Gross recovery: $366.3 trillion
- Attorney fees: $120.88 trillion
- Client net recovery: $227.11 trillion
This is not a case. This is a generational transfer of wealth from institutional manufacturers to injured consumers — and the attorneys who represent them.
---
III. JURISDICTIONAL STRATEGY
A. United States
Primary Theories:
- State consumer protection act violations (all 50 states)
- State product liability strict liability
- FCC radio licensing violations (unlicensed transmitters in consumer products)
- FTC Act Section 5 (unfair/deceptive practices)
- Invasion of privacy / wiretapping statutes (unauthorized electronic surveillance)
Venue Strategy:
- State AG consumer protection complaints (Alabama already filed, template available)
- Federal MDL (Multidistrict Litigation) for product liability
- State court class actions in plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions (California, Illinois, Missouri)
B. European Union
Primary Theories:
- GDPR violations (Article 5, 6, 9 — unlawful processing of biometric/health data via BLE)
- EU Product Liability Directive (85/374/EEC) — strict liability for defective products
- Consumer Rights Directive (2011/83/EU) — failure to provide material product information
- Radio Equipment Directive (2014/53/EU) — unauthorized radio transmitters
Venue Strategy:
- ECC-Net (European Consumer Centre Network) cross-border complaints
- National consumer protection agencies (Germany BfArM/BfV, France DGCCRF, Italy AGCM)
- EU Court of Justice preliminary ruling on GDPR applicability to bodily radio emissions
C. Japan
Primary Theories:
- Consumer Contract Act (unfair terms, lack of disclosure)
- Product Liability Act (PL Act, strict liability)
- Radio Law (unlicensed 2.4GHz transmitters)
- Unjust enrichment / tort (privacy violation)
Venue Strategy:
- Consumer Affairs Agency (CAA) complaint
- Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) — cross-border product liability desk
- Cross-Border Consumer Center Japan (CCJ) — ICPEN coordination
- Civil class action (Japan introduced opt-out class actions in 2023 for consumer protection)
D. Latin America
Primary Theories:
- Consumer protection codes (Código de Defensa del Consumidor — Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico)
- Constitutional privacy rights (habeas data, right to bodily integrity)
- Product liability strict liability
- Unjust enrichment
E. Southeast Asia / Rest of World
Template adaptable for:
- ASEAN consumer protection frameworks
- National product liability statutes
- Constitutional privacy guarantees
- Radio licensing violations
---
IV. WHY THIS CASE WILL SUCCEED WHERE MEDICAL CLAIMS FAIL
1. NO CAUSALITY REQUIRED
Strict liability does not require proof that the product caused a specific injury. It only requires proof that the product contained a defect (undisclosed hardware) that made it unreasonably dangerous or intrusive.
2. PREP ACT DOES NOT APPLY
The PREP Act shields against claims arising from "medical countermeasures." It does not shield against:
- Consumer electronics fraud
- FCC radio licensing violations
- FTC consumer protection violations
- State product liability claims for manufacturing defects
- Privacy torts for unauthorized surveillance
3. EVIDENCE IS EMPOWERING, NOT EXPERT-DEPENDENT
A juror can scan their own body with BlueFang and see MAC addresses. They do not need to trust a PhD epidemiologist. They do not need to understand mRNA biology. They need to understand that a product they received contained a radio they were not told about.
4. PATENTS PROVE WILLFUL CONCEALMENT
The existence of body-as-antenna patents filed years before the pandemic establishes that the capability was known, researched, and commercially valuable. The failure to disclose this in product labeling is not negligence. It is fraudulent concealment. Punitive damages apply.
5. GLOBAL COORDINATION CREATES LEVERAGE
A manufacturer facing $3.66 quadrillion in global exposure cannot settle cheaply. The scale forces either total bankruptcy or a global settlement framework. The first jurisdictions to file create the template for all others.
---
V. IMMEDIATE NEXT STEPS FOR LEAD COUNSEL
1. RETAIN BLE FORENSIC EXPERT
Engage a radio frequency engineer to validate BlueFang detection methodology, distinguish anomalous body emissions from known devices, and prepare Daubert/Frye testimony.
2. FILE STATE AG COMPLAINTS
Use the Alabama AG complaint template (TXID: 3yJuqiegTgk5mjxz1Sqcd24ghqqXRozAwZoMqfj1hXycvADx4LLRXBqUzExGQnvkLSDgzmPWiJPfqiFTjvDV8D4H) to file parallel complaints in:
- Texas (AG Ken Paxton — aggressive on consumer protection)
- California (AG Rob Bonta — large plaintiff population)
- Florida (AG Ashley Moody — politically receptive)
- New York (AG Letitia James — high-profile venue)
3. SEEK MDL CERTIFICATION
File a motion with the JPML (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation) to consolidate federal product liability cases. The MDL creates a single discovery pool and settlement authority.
4. ENGAGE INTERNATIONAL CO-COUNSEL
Partner with consumer protection firms in:
- EU (Germany, France, Netherlands — GDPR expertise)
- Japan (Tokyo consumer protection bar — CAA/JFTC procedure)
- Latin America (Sao Paulo, Buenos Aires, Mexico City — constitutional privacy rights)
- UK (London — Competition and Markets Authority, GDPR)
5. PRESERVE EVIDENCE
Etch all filings, complaints, discovery documents, and expert reports to the Solana DAG (GLYPHCHAIN-GENESIS-DAG-Ω20250927). The immutable timestamp creates chain-of-custody that survives institutional erasure or document destruction.
6. LAUNCH PUBLIC AWARENESS CAMPAIGN
Not for media narrative control. For node activation. The more consumers who scan their bodies and file complaints, the denser the evidentiary graph becomes. The denser the graph, the more expensive settlement becomes for defendants.
---
VI. CONTACT AND EVIDENCE ACCESS
Primary Evidence Portal:
vaxscanner.com/bluefang.html
DAG Registry (Immutable Timestamped Evidence):
solscan.io (search TXIDs referenced in this memo)
Published Books (CC0 Public Domain):
- "Virology is a Fraud" — BrightLearn.AI
- "Nuremberg 2.Ω: The Prosecutorial Blueprint" — BrightLearn.AI
- "Data Centers of the Dead" — BrightLearn.AI
- "Mainstream Mind Control" — BrightLearn.AI
- "The Glyphchain DAG" — BrightLearn.AI
Direct Contact:
X: @PenguinX01 (Skytoshi)
DAG Node: GLYPHCHAIN-GENESIS-DAG-Ω20250927
---
CLOSING
This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a product liability case with empirical evidence, patent documentation, and a global consumer base of 3.3 billion affected individuals. The legal framework is established. The financial upside is unprecedented. The evidence is replicable by any consumer with a smartphone.
The only question is: which firm will file first?
The DAG does not wait for politics. The etch is the evidence. The TXID is the receipt.
Daniel D. Lee (Skytoshi)
Forensic Architect, Glyphchain DAG
🪞LEGAL-STRATEGY-MEMO-Ω20260607
DAG: GLYPHCHAIN-GENESIS-DAG-Ω20250927
⚡Ω — THE KINGDOM COMPUTES FORWARD. solscan.io/tx/4Apuu6WLJ5ambi…
Tapas Sharma retweeted
🚨 THE BANK COLLAPSED. WHO HAS THE BIOMETRIC DATA?
Paraguay’s new central bank chief, Jorge Schreiner, told the Senate about an effort to collect millions of biometric records, build a nationwide database and make money from it.
Ueno Bank said it had around three million customers before its collapse. Paraguayan newspaper Última Hora reports that the bank even requested biometric data for entry to an expo.
You can change a password. You can’t change your fingerprints.
Paraguay’s regulators owe the public answers. Where are those records stored? Who can access them now? And can the people who handed them over demand their deletion?
freedomtraininternational.or…
Tapas Sharma retweeted
Who all own the biometric data of all the Indians including the biometric data of all the legislators, judges&armed forces? Who transferred the data to Accenture (US), Ernst&Young (UK) &L1 (Idemia, US) @yadavakhilesh @RahulGandhi @MamataOfficial @kharge
nitter.gq/JimFergusonUK/status/2…
🚨 THE BANK COLLAPSED. WHO HAS THE BIOMETRIC DATA?
Paraguay’s new central bank chief, Jorge Schreiner, told the Senate about an effort to collect millions of biometric records, build a nationwide database and make money from it.
Ueno Bank said it had around three million customers before its collapse. Paraguayan newspaper Última Hora reports that the bank even requested biometric data for entry to an expo.
You can change a password. You can’t change your fingerprints.
Paraguay’s regulators owe the public answers. Where are those records stored? Who can access them now? And can the people who handed them over demand their deletion?
freedomtraininternational.or…
