tech-insider.org/florida-dmv…
Driver's License data with signatures from the DHSMV breach of DAVID
![Florida DMV Hacked Again: 2nd Breach Confirmed [2026]](https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/2117222189393145857/P0cQkbsa?format=jpg&name=800x419)
RedZone retweeted
In accordance with Section 501.171, F.S., FLHSMV is issuing this substitute notice because it may not have current mailing addresses for impacted customers who no longer hold a valid Florida driver license or identification card or who previously had a vehicle titled in Florida.
FLHSMV has begun notifying individuals potentially affected by the data breach. To protect the identity of those impacted, the Department has partnered with Sontiq, Inc., a TransUnion company, to offer complimentary identity and credit monitoring services and $1 million identity theft insurance for 1 year. The Department takes the privacy and security of Floridians very seriously and is working diligently to implement further safeguards that will mitigate the risk of similar incidents occurring in the future. For more information, visit FLHSMV.gov/DataBreach.
RedZone retweeted
Indepth technical analysis. If you're in IT, you will understand this fully on the security breakdown and understand there are different threat models.
Jason made a simple statement, he trust his smart fridge before he'd trust the voting sustems.
09 VV26 Day18 Jason Wareham and Manbir Gullati - There and Back Again
In 2025, Mojave Research received an assignment its founders never expected: examine security vulnerabilities in voting equipment used during Puerto Rico’s 2024 elections.
youtu.be/Ja3QhoCKzzQ?is=nKUR…
09 VV26 Day18 Jason Wareham and Manbir Gullati - There and Back Again
In 2025, Mojave Research received an assignment its founders never expected: examine security vulnerabilities in voting equipment used during Puerto Rico’s 2024 elections.
youtu.be/Ja3QhoCKzzQ?is=nKUR…
RedZone retweeted
Attorney General James Uthmeier Charges Canadian Citizen for Illegally Voting in Multiple Florida Elections -
myfloridalegal.com/newsrelea…
RedZone retweeted
I've written 6 published peer-reviewed studies on voter roll irregularities for the Journal of Information Warfare.
JIW is focused on cyber security and the use of information to conduct war.
The fact that their reviewers decided to publish my papers tells you something: their cyber security experts consider the threat posed by corrupted voter rolls to be so serious that it could be classified as an act of war.
And what are the findings?
In brief:
1. Count of voters who voted changes with every snapshot for old elections (can't tell who or how many people voted in any election)
2. Presence of substantial numbers of illegal records makes it impossible to know how many qualified voters exist in any state surveyed.
3. Unusual algorithms used in some states to assign ID numbers can be used as covert data channels.
4. Photographically identical signatures on registration applications evidence forgery and identity theft.
5. Backdated registration dates indicate falsified data pertinent to question whether votes made were legal.
6. Presence of purged records creates large pool of records that can be used to generate illegitimate ballots.
There is more, but the bottom line is this: The rolls are the heart of any election, yet they are so compromised they aren't fit for use.
Would you board a plane with its engines on fire because the airline painted "Completely Safe" on the fuselage? That's what voting with these rolls is like.
RedZone retweeted
🚨Florida found 118,615 voter records that didn’t exist in the Oct 22, 2024 snapshot — but suddenly appeared by Nov 12.
61,711 of them claim they registered before Florida’s Oct 7 deadline.
These “new” voters popped up after Election Day, with registration dates going back to the 1950s — artificially spread across decades to look natural.
Exactly like the 60k+ sudden dump in CA District 28 during vote counting.
RedZone retweeted
After finding double votes across clone groups, I had a follow-up question.
If there are X double-voting clone pairs in the 2021 snapshot, why does that number increase in 2022? And again in 2023? And again in 2025?
Elections don't change after they happen. A vote cast in 2016 is a vote cast in 2016. That record should be fixed.
But it isn't.
With every new snapshot, more clone records are showing votes assigned to them — including votes in elections that happened years earlier. Someone is going into the official voter history and writing in votes after the fact.
That raised a second question. If votes are being added to some clone records, are votes simultaneously being removed from others?
This image answers that.
382 people — real names, real dates of birth, real state ID numbers — had their double-vote records scrubbed from the database between snapshots. They showed up as having voted twice. Then that evidence disappeared from the official record.
At the same time, other clone records that previously showed no votes suddenly had votes written into their history.
These are not database errors. Someone looked at records showing that a person had voted twice under two different ID numbers and changed the official history so it no longer showed that. And someone looked at other clone records and added votes that were not there before.
The voter roll is supposed to be an immutable historical document. What we are seeing is active, ongoing rewriting of the official election record — after the elections are over.
RedZone retweeted
Dr. Daugherity: "I consider this a much more dangerous attack because it doesn't even require manipulation of the State Voter Rolls." (Because the KnowInk System can simply add Counterfeit Voters on the fly)
rumble.com/v777gfk-this-scar…
RedZone retweeted
Q: Can you have the firmware that allows the modem to remain on even when the (election) software thinks that it's off?
A: Yes ... through the operating system I can enable that component.
U.S. court testimony under oath ... 👇
Yes, the Dominion Systems have modems that can connect to the internet, but they are disabled by election officials who dutifully test to assure they are switched off.
Venezuelan Engineer Testimony: That doesn't matter. They can be remotely switched on by us.
lindelloffensefund.org/wp-co…
RedZone retweeted
I'm catching a flight to Texas in a few hours.
Before I go: the Bexar fraud machine has one more moving part nobody's reported yet.
The precinct field was being written by the same algorithm that generated 4,110 fake voters — and I can now describe exactly how it decides what number to write.
This is what deliberate fraud looks like from the inside.
Read it before I board 🔽
@ZoomWalter @WestonMartinez @Lorionafarm @PeterBernegger @CivilRights @PamBondi @FBIDirectorKash @KenPaxtonTX
🤖 Made with AI
RedZone retweeted
@AbsoluteWithE @EmeraldRobinson
Here are the Reports and the full article.
nitter.gq/Unite4Freedom/status/2…
RedZone retweeted
TEXAS IS BREAKING ITS OWN ELECTION LAWS — RIGHT NOW
During the 2026 Primary, Texas failed to follow its own Election Code. Not slightly — systemically.
Texas law, Section 87.121 of the Texas Election Code, mandates that early voting clerks maintain a daily public roster of voters:
In-person voting: Updated daily, published by 11:00 a.m. next day
Mail-in ballots: Published by 11:00 a.m. the day after receipt
This data must be posted online and include:
Name
Address (unless confidential)
VUID
Precinct
Date voted
During early voting, Texas released data in FOUR different formats.
Only ONE met legal requirements.
The other THREE were missing County or Precinct data or BOTH.
Why This Matters
1. The law wasn’t followed.
“Just obey the law” didn’t happen.
2. It blocks real analysis.
Our 2024 data showed voters appearing in multiple precincts and counties.
That pattern can only be detected with complete, consistent data.
This made that far more difficult.
When required data is:
Incomplete
Inconsistent
Constantly changing
…it doesn’t look accidental.
It looks like obfuscation.
And nothing signals wrongdoing more clearly than making verification harder.
When the law requires transparency — and the State delivers confusion — that’s not compliance.
Texans, and all Americans, deserve better
Because without verification…
there is no trust.
RedZone retweeted
In Texas, this manipulation is happening in BOTH R and D primaries.
Democrat primary:
• 37,039 voter IDs appearing, disappearing, reappearing
• 35,169 injected ballots
• 10,558 deleted voter records
Republican primary:
• 87,336 voter oscillations
• 35,772 injected ballots
• 66,146 deleted voter records
Let that sink in.
Votes appear.
Votes disappear.
Votes multiply.
That does not happen in a lawful election system.
These are not “glitches.”
They are impossible patterns unless someone is inside the system manipulating records in real time.
And notice something important:
It’s happening to both parties.
Which means this isn’t Republicans cheating Democrats.
It isn’t Democrats cheating Republicans.
The American people are being cheated.
Someone inside our election infrastructure has the ability to add votes, delete votes, and alter voter history during the election itself.
That means the will of the voter is no longer the controlling force in our elections.
The controlling force becomes whoever has access to the system.
This is why the endless distractions about algorithms, machines, or personalities miss the point.
The evidence shows something far more dangerous:
The breach is inside the system.
And until this is confronted directly, Americans are being forced to participate in what increasingly looks like a “trust me bro” election system instead of a verifiable one.
The data does not lie.
And the American people deserve to know who is doing this.
RedZone retweeted
What can happen next after a HAVA complaint is filed by a citizen in any state or county::
A HAVA complaint (under the Help America Vote Act) is initially an administrative civil process, but the facts uncovered during that process can reveal violations of other federal laws. When that happens, the matter can move beyond administrative review and into civil enforcement or criminal investigation.
Here is the progression in simple terms.
1. Administrative Complaint (HAVA §402)
Under HAVA, any voter can file a complaint with a state alleging violations of federal election requirements. The state must provide:
a. A hearing on the record
b. A written determination
c. A decision within 90 days
At this stage the process is fact-finding and administrative, not criminal.
2. Discovery of Federal Election Law Violations
During the hearing or investigation, evidence may show violations of other federal statutes governing elections, such as:
a. National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) – improper removal of voters from registration rolls.
b. HAVA §303 – failure to maintain accurate statewide voter databases.
c. Record-keeping and retention obligations under the Civil Rights Act of 1960 (which requires preservation of election records)
If records appear altered, destroyed, or manipulated improperly, the issue moves beyond administrative compliance.
3. Referral to Federal Authorities
HAVA specifically allows for escalation.
Evidence uncovered in the complaint process can be referred to:
a. The U.S. Department of Justice
b. The Election Assistance Commission
c. A U.S. Attorney’s Office
At this point the issue can become a federal investigation.
4. Potential Criminal Statutes
If investigators determine that records were intentionally manipulated or destroyed, several criminal statutes could apply, for example:
a. 8 U.S.C. §1519 – destruction or falsification of federal records
b. 52 U.S.C. §20511 – election fraud involving voter registration records
c. 18 U.S.C. §371 – conspiracy to defraud the United States
d. Civil Rights Act election record provisions requiring preservation of federal election records.
Intentional falsification or destruction of election records can carry significant criminal penalties.
5. Why the Administrative Process Matters
The HAVA complaint system functions as a gateway mechanism:
a. Citizens identify potential violations
b. The state must create a formal record and investigation
c. Evidence generated can trigger federal oversight or criminal referral
In other words, a HAVA complaint itself is not a criminal charge, but it can uncover facts that lead to civil enforcement actions or criminal investigations if federal election laws or record-preservation laws were violated.
RedZone retweeted
Why all of a sudden the made-up bullsh*t attacking @DNIGabbard?
CAUGHT! Because the Deep State/Leviathan/Matrix is in a state of total panic!
Yes, the Dominion Systems have modems that can connect to the internet, but they are disabled by election officials who dutifully test to ensure they are switched off.
Venezuelan Engineer Testimony: That doesn't matter. They can be remotely switched on by us.
lindelloffensefund.org/wp-co…
