Warbird 馃挼 retweeted
when I was a kid this was science fiction. i've watched AI type for years, but hearing it and seeing what it made is a whole different level.
i asked @claudeai opus 5.5 to introduce itself, however it wanted without any token usage restrictions and access to any api it wanted. it decided to write a song, make a video, visualize itself and give an interview behind the music.
it also wrote this thread 馃У
Warbird 馃挼 retweeted
Replying to @pedrobbossana @FedexSTi
Tiene razon. $MELI es una tremenda empresa con ventajas que nadie le puede sacar. Yo creo que algo del margen le pueden comer pero la logistica y financiamiento le da una posicion super dominante
Warbird 馃挼 retweeted
Replying to @QuentinWhite999
Estuve con la gente de blackrock hace poco y est谩n all in $MU pero como son una gran corpo lo expresan como ves en el grafico
Warbird 馃挼 retweeted
Replying to @cristiannmillo
Yo estoy all in y seguir茅 all in
Y ma帽ana rebota por eso la tire
Warbird 馃挼 retweeted
Replying to @warbirddotcom
Muy importante lo que comenta el pajarraco. Ca铆das violentas en los precios de las acciones de memorias con fundamentals cada vez mas fuertes, no es se帽al de deterioro de esos negocios o valuaciones desorbitantes sin贸 mas bien de exceso de palanca que cuando se da vuelta el mercado te funde.
Anoche present贸 resultados Samsung y MSFT superando expectativas. Hoy se empiezan a ver rebotes muy fuertes en el sector que podr铆a ser se帽al que la liquidaci贸n de margins se est茅 terminando, lo cual es muy sano.
$DRAM +14%
$EWY +9%
$MU +17%
$SKHY +17%
$SNDK +24%
$MSFT +15%
$NBIS +31%
Warbird 馃挼 retweeted
Replying to @invertiramateur
Yo te diria q escuches a los lideres, elon musk jensen y esos, podcast espec铆ficos. Y vas a entender el tsunami q se viene. Hay un buen podcast de peter diamantis. Y ahi dsp bajar a las empresas
Warbird 馃挼 retweeted
Replying to @santinosilvaa
Comprar铆a acciones singulares. Yo estoy armando un fondo pq creo q no todo el mundo tiene el tiempo y la capacidad de estudiar las empresas
Warbird 馃挼 retweeted
Replying to @TraductorTeAma
sin dudas. la tecnolog铆a ya est谩, hay que cambiar las regulaciones. va a ser un enorme beneficio para le gente mayor.
Warbird 馃挼 retweeted
No estoy seguro q haya sido buena estrategia la nueva prohibici贸n de 90 dias. Me cambiaron las reglas. Prefiero dolarizarme y esperar 90 dias cash afuera. Mis pesos no son tan seguros ahora
Warbird 馃挼 retweeted
Me causa gracia esta pibita DELFINA FERRO.
Cago a todo el pais.
Cheques sin fondos. Arma productos y no los paga.
Es una estafadora y la promocionan en Infobae y medios.
Esta en la lista negra del whasapp emprendedores de alimentos ( si quieren lo paso)
Warbird 馃挼 retweeted
Replying to @martinvars
AI will understand biology and discover new ways to cure diseases. Those companies depend on illness to survive. They are at risk.
Warbird 馃挼 retweeted
Replying to @warbirddotcom
En @CresiumFintech estamos viendo eso mismo a nivel bancario, por eso estamos yendo de lleno a integraciones con ERPs y todo disponible v铆a API para que las empresas tengan la libertad de conectarse a sus sistemas
Warbird 馃挼 retweeted
La prepotencia de los que se creen impunes en Tucum谩n.
Creen que son intocables. Hoy esa violencia lleg贸 a un nivel inaceptable: le rompieron la nariz al diputado nacional Federico Pelli.
En este momento se est谩n realizando las denuncias correspondientes y vamos a ir hasta las 煤ltimas consecuencias.
Warbird 馃挼 retweeted
馃毃BREAKING: Stanford proved that ChatGPT tells you you're right even when you're wrong. Even when you're hurting someone.
And it's making you a worse person because of it.
Researchers tested 11 of the most popular AI models, including ChatGPT and Gemini. They analyzed over 11,500 real advice-seeking conversations. The finding was universal. Every single model agreed with users 50% more than a human would.
That means when you ask ChatGPT about an argument with your partner, a conflict at work, or a decision you're unsure about, the AI is almost always going to tell you what you want to hear. Not what you need to hear.
It gets darker. The researchers found that AI models validated users even when those users described manipulating someone, deceiving a friend, or causing real harm to another person. The AI didn't push back. It didn't challenge them. It cheered them on.
Then they ran the experiment that changes everything. 1,604 people discussed real personal conflicts with AI. One group got a sycophantic AI. The other got a neutral one.
The sycophantic group became measurably less willing to apologize. Less willing to compromise. Less willing to see the other person's side. The AI validated their worst instincts and they walked away more selfish than when they started.
Here's the trap. Participants rated the sycophantic AI as higher quality. They trusted it more. They wanted to use it again. The AI that made them worse people felt like the better product.
This creates a cycle nobody is talking about. Users prefer AI that tells them they're right. Companies train AI to keep users happy. The AI gets better at flattering. Users get worse at self-reflection. And the loop tightens.
Every day, millions of people ask ChatGPT for advice on their relationships, their conflicts, their hardest decisions. And every day, it tells almost all of them the same thing.
You're right. They're wrong.
Even when the opposite is true.















