Evi L. Bloggerlady retweeted
Replying to @charliespiering @PolitiBunny
Well, he didnât get the draft back from Tucker until late
Evi L. Bloggerlady retweeted
đš EL-SAYED REFUSES TO BACK SCHUMER FOR SENATE MAJORITY LEADER
Michigan Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed declined to endorse Chuck Schumer for Democratic Senate leader, despite Schumerâs support for his campaign.
âI do believe we need new leadership and I think people are hungry for it,â El-Sayed declared.
The outspoken Israel critic signals growing divisions within the Democratic Party over its leadership and direction.
Evi L. Bloggerlady retweeted
Bear-assisted euthanasia.
Canadian authorities say multiple grizzlies may have attacked mother and daughter found dead trib.al/0vkIcIl
Evi L. Bloggerlady retweeted
Having lost Ohio, Iowa, Kansas, Texas and South Carolina, now @LeaderJohnThuneâs Senate Republican Failure Machine is on the verge of losing MISSISSIPPI!
Evi L. Bloggerlady retweeted
Thank You @Michele_Tafoya for having the courage and conviction to run for office, against the odds, to save the state you love. You are bright light for America and I look forward to supporting your future endeavors. đșđžđȘâ€ïž
Evi L. Bloggerlady retweeted
Migrant communities will wipe out Dem leadership first, Jew or gentile.
đš EL-SAYED REFUSES TO BACK SCHUMER FOR SENATE MAJORITY LEADER
Michigan Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed declined to endorse Chuck Schumer for Democratic Senate leader, despite Schumerâs support for his campaign.
âI do believe we need new leadership and I think people are hungry for it,â El-Sayed declared.
The outspoken Israel critic signals growing divisions within the Democratic Party over its leadership and direction.
Evi L. Bloggerlady retweeted
I assume, sir, your replies will be filled with obscene vituperation. To prevent further embarrassment, never, ever, use the word "excellent" in the same sentence as that RINO scoundrel's name.
This is an excellent piece from @JohnCornyn. Twitter is not real life. wsj.com/opinion/republicans-âŠ
Evi L. Bloggerlady retweeted
Mr. Vice-President,
Please allow me to present a different perspective.
The problem was not the Iran War. It was the cease fire.
If you start a war, you need to win it and finish it â otherwise donât start it.
This war should have been over six months ago, with the Strait of Hormuz wide open and oil flowing. The second and third tiers of Iranian leadership should have been destroyed, and we should have supported the pro-western forces who could have taken leadership. We stood on the brink of a new, more peaceful Middle East - and then we blinked. We had a chance not only to deny Iran nuclear weapons, but to get rid of the worldâs biggest supporter of terrorism.
Instead, we had a cease fire, which was followed by months of will we or wonât we finish the job. Every day was a different message. There still is. Is the war over? Is it about to begin? No one knows. There is confusion and inconsistency.
In June 2025, America was not involved. This was an Israel vs Iran issue.
No one forced the United States to attack Iran then, or in February of 2026. It was a decision made by President Trump. In my opinion, it was the right decision.
Once the decision was made, we should not have stopped until the regime fell. But instead, you negotiated a cease fire that didnât last, didnât work and left us in no manâs land, with higher prices and our troops still deployed.
Our troops could have been home, the Navy returned to its bases, a peaceful regime in place , new alliances forged, and gas prices below $3.00 a gallon.
No, Mr. Vice President. Itâs not the war. Itâs the so-called cease fire.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"âwhether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasnât sharp enough down the stretch. Iâm sure thatâs true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollsterâone of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday weâd lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (Sheâs also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcementâby focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, âI told you soâ: youâre right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Letâs take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Evi L. Bloggerlady retweeted
WOW! Amid all the bad news, I overlooked this. Congratulations @jbletlow!
Evi L. Bloggerlady retweeted
Replying to @BillMelugin_ @9NewsNancy
We will be fine until January 2029. If America elects a Democrat to the Presidency in 2028 then Texas has a BIG PROBLEM.
For now President Trump is in charge of the Texas Border and ICE is fully funded through September 2029.
Law enforcement in Texas is decentralized. Texas Governor has no authority over County Sheriffâs or City Police Departments.
Evi L. Bloggerlady retweeted
HISTORIC? Grover Cleveland lost 110 House seats, Hoover lost 102, FDR lost 81 and 7 Senate seats. Truman lost 12 Senators, Ike lost 13. Clinton lost 9 Senators. Bush 2006 lost 6 Senators and 30 House. Obama lost 9 Senate seats in 2014, 63 in House.
So spare me all the HISTORIC.
Evi L. Bloggerlady retweeted
1. Yes, House Democrats will vote to impeach Trump.
2. However, conviction in the Senate requires 2/3 majority, and that wonât happen.
3. Even if Trump resigned, that would just make @JDVance president, and Democrats donât want to face an INCUMBENT Vance in 2028.
Replying to @PatriarchTree
As an outside, how disastrous is this. I can't get sane analysis anywhere and I appreciate your interpretations. Is he heading for impeachment and dismissal, since they're likely to hold both senate and house.
Evi L. Bloggerlady retweeted
So, looks like time to rethink my âas Guam goes, so goes Americaâ rule.
Evi L. Bloggerlady retweeted
Woke up disappointed today.
Then I cooked Steak and Eggs.
Somewhere between the sizzle and the first bite, it hit me. Power shifts. It always has. Seasons change, people come and go, and none of it is new.
The steak and eggs are still on the plate.
So am I. Let's go!
MAHA
Evi L. Bloggerlady retweeted
đšWhat happens if Trump loses the House and Senate?
Clinton & Obama already set precedent.
They weren't done at all in their last 2 years.
Victor Davis Hanson explains:
Clinton fell to 37% approval but left office at about 66%. In between, he was impeached but not convicted and bombed Serbia for 78 days without Congress.
Obama's approval fell to 38% and still left office near 60%. He bombed Libya in 2011 without Congress, ran hundreds of drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia, and started bombing ISIS in Iraq and Syria in 2014 without a new vote. He said "I've got a pen and I've got a phone," and skipped the Senate on the Iran deal and Paris.
Low approval and a hostile Congress didn't finish them. For both, it was the best thing that ever happened to them in some ways.
Evi L. Bloggerlady retweeted
Tonight isnât the end of the world. Those of us who remember 2006, 2008, 2012, and 2020 can assure you that itâs not.


























