To all those who minimize VAERS as ‘A SIGNAL-DETECTION system.’ Correct. Ask yourself: So what exactly is the purpose of detecting a signal if nobody investigates the signal? CDC itself says that when VAERS detects a safety signal, scientists may conduct further studies through systems like VSD or CISA, and that CDC/FDA investigate further and act if needed. Spare me the consistent mantra: “it’s insanely rare” line unless you can show me the denominator and the follow-up investigation that established how rare it actually is. You cannot simultaneously argue: “VAERS cannot establish causation.” and then leap to: “Therefore the event functionally doesn’t exist.” ‼️That is not science. That is skipping the investigation. And history already proves why post-market signals matter. 🛑RotaShield was pulled after VAERS reports raised concern about intussusception; CDC then conducted large investigations, confirmed an increased risk, ACIP withdrew its recommendation, and the manufacturer removed the vaccine from the market. 🛑The Johnson & Johnson COVID vaccine was also paused after a small number of serious clotting reports triggered investigation. But here’s a more interesting one for you to ponder: ‼️Look at oral polio vaccine. From 1980–1998, CDC documented 152 paralytic polio cases in the United States — 144 of them were vaccine-associated paralytic polio (VAPP). ‼️A.k.a. the vaccine caused polio‼️ ‼️CDC explicitly states that, since 1979, the 144 indigenous U.S. polio cases were associated with use of live oral polio vaccine. What happened next? 🛑The United States changed the childhood schedule 🛑REMOVED THE ORAL POLIO VACCINE FROM THE SCHEDULE and moved to the new inactivated, a polio vaccine - IPV-only in 2000 specifically to eliminate the risk of VAPP. Let that sink in… They let 8 to 10 children get paralyzed from the Vaccine per year up until the year 2000… before they pulled it off the market… I guess 8 to 10 annually was two “rare”— they had to wait until 144 kids paralyzed to call it “not rare” enough define remove it ‼️That is literally how pharmacovigilance is supposed to work: So yes — VAERS is “just a signaling system.” Duh. That is precisely the point. ‼️Signal → investigate → quantify risk → determine causation → act accordingly. Not: ❌Signal → dismiss → declare it rare → move on.🙄 That isn’t how a safety surveillance system is supposed to work. The people are not nearly angry enough about what U.S. public health authorities have allowed to be injected into children while those same authorities get to decide how much injury, disability, and death still counts as “rare enough” to leave a product on the market. At some point, the question is not whether the harm is rare. The question is: how much carnage is acceptable before they finally admit the signal matters? @SecKennedy @POTUS @McCulloughFund @lifebiomedguru @autismspeaks @ae_society @EncephGlobal @encephalitis @encephalitis411 @EdenDoraTrust @encephalopathy @DiedSuddenly_ @DiedSuddenlyNws