JennJennRN 🇺🇸 (@jenmade58) header
JennJennRN 🇺🇸 (@jenmade58) profile picture

Nurse. Former Compliance Officer. Believer in honesty, integrity, accountability and equality for all. No DMs#RightMattersTruthMatters

Ohio, USA
Joined April 2009
Photo by JennJennRN 🇺🇸 (@jenmade58)Photo by JennJennRN 🇺🇸 (@jenmade58)Photo by JennJennRN 🇺🇸 (@jenmade58)
JennJennRN 🇺🇸 retweeted
These incoming Democrats know we can walk and chew gum at the same time 🔥🔥🔥🔥
Corruption is a hidden tax. I’m fighting it for two reasons: to bring your costs down and to ensure no one in power is above the law.
7
44
1
329
5,489
JennJennRN 🇺🇸 retweeted
I agree.
🚨 BREAKING: AOC just called out the media for spending years fixated on Biden’s cognition while barely touching Trump’s very real cognitive decline and escalating erratic behavior. None of this is normal. And pretending it is, is journalistic malpractice.
18
219
2
906
5,221
JennJennRN 🇺🇸 retweeted
NEW: Thomas Massie warns the Senate that if his Pete Hegseth impeachment resolution passes the House but Senate GOP stalls, the articles will survive into the next Congress and a Democratic majority will run any Senate trial
96
1,119
26
9,419
280,546
JennJennRN 🇺🇸 retweeted
“You think I don’t have the votes nailed down?” @RepJeffries boasts that he has speaker locked up and says @SenSchumer should also remain leader — as they take credit and pat themselves on the back for the blue tsunami (that saw candidates win they had never even heard of)
223
199
62
631
18,841
JennJennRN 🇺🇸 retweeted
I’ve heard a lot of hot takes from Republicans on the midterms, but this is a new one.
383
204
43
1,324
40,903
JennJennRN 🇺🇸 retweeted
Everyone knew about Russell Brand. Everyone knew about Diddy, R. Kelly, Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby, and Jeffrey Epstein. Everyone knew about Donald Trump. I’m so tired of people protecting rich perverts, keeping their dark secrets for decades. So damn tired.
114
2,293
27
10,626
100,238
JennJennRN 🇺🇸 retweeted
😂😂😂😂😂😂
42
841
44
3,778
36,515
JennJennRN 🇺🇸 retweeted
Is AOC being threatened or blackmailed? Her support of Jeffries makes no sense. She's one of the few Democrats who doesn't accept any AIPAC money. Has she been replaced by a robot? This is very strange.
524
475
92
7,636
267,459
JennJennRN 🇺🇸 retweeted
BREAKING: In a stunning moment, Rep. Jamie Raskin just went on live TV and made clear that it is REPUBLICANS who have turned the government into an apparatus of retribution. Every time Republicans scream about RETRIBUTION, it's an admission. Make sure every American sees this.
82
1,450
13
4,257
94,489
JennJennRN 🇺🇸 retweeted
I have tremendous respect for the two Democratic Senators who have negotiated the permitting bill with two of their Republican colleagues — a bill that Congress is considering for passage during the lame duck session. I sincerely and respectfully urge the Democratic sponsors of the bill to reconsider their decision to move forward with this legislation. There’s no doubt that we need to reform the way that clean energy projects are reviewed and permitted. But as it currently stands, the bill would be an extremely serious mistake, in my opinion, and would do far more harm than good. Given how this Administration has run roughshod over the environmental laws and protections that are currently in place, now is not the time to give the Trump administration freer rein to double down on fossil fuels — which is what President Trump would surely do. And after last week’s historic election, we will have a new Congress in January that can strike a far better balance.
134
706
124
2,821
221,424
JennJennRN 🇺🇸 retweeted
BREAKING: CNN has called CO-04 for Eileen Laubacher! BLUE flip! Bye bye Felicia 👏🤞👋👋
30
398
16
2,501
16,391
JennJennRN 🇺🇸 retweeted
Just because Chuck Schumer claimed he was an important part of the blue wave doesn't mean it's true.He did a ton more undercutting quality candidates than he did orchestrating electoral wins! Don't forget he endorsed Israel 1st Haley Stevens who endorsed the pedo& genocide party
24
307
6
939
4,878
JennJennRN 🇺🇸 retweeted
Hakeem may survive even if Chuck is toast, but he is already getting his wings clipped as rank and file House Democrats are watching him closely. But breaking bread with Kushner should be disqualifying.
38
295
12
1,126
7,168
JennJennRN 🇺🇸 retweeted
When Trump is gone - and he will be - and Trumpism finally subsides - which it will - history will speak to the size and fervor of the cult; how easily so many were gaslit; how they embraced the most flawed cult leader EVER; how they rallied around grievance just for the sake of grievance; how they railed against their own freakin' best interests to our collective detriment; and how they succumbed to such an obvious f*cking con. History will also speak to The People rising up - saying "no more" and saying it resoundingly across the country - and shifting the politics of 99% of districts away from him. Where we go from here is uncertain, as there are months before the Dems take power, and - mark my words - the real unforeseen disaster that almost took down the American experiment - that the history books will record as such - IS STILL CONTINUING. It is not about Trump OR the cult - it's our legacy media's longtime, widespread, and incessant normalization of a madman. He still rants about sold-out rallies that WEREN'T sold out, a vandalized pool that WASN'T vandalized, made-up frauds that AREN'T real, ending wars that HAVEN'T ended, and fake news that ISN'T fake, and he still gets covered as sentient, lucid, trustworthy, and believable. He is NONE of those things. The People did their part, and now our media needs to call HIM out at every turn, call out truth at every opportunity, and start calling loudly for his resignation.
12
287
5
900
11,076
JennJennRN 🇺🇸 retweeted
I went grocery shopping on Saturday. The previous time was 3 weeks ago. In that short time span the prices of produce related items skyrocketed. My whole wheat hamburger buns (8 count) went from $4.50 to $6.50 and blueberries were up nearly $2.00 for the container that I buy. Other stuff was up too, but I noticed those right off the bat. It was jaw dropping. High diesel prices to transport goods and the increased cost of fertilizer caused by the Iran War are hitting hard all of the sudden. The price of gas was already bad enough but everything is piling on. I know relief won't come overnight but I can't wait for Congress to take some action. It's what we voted for and expect.
16
36
90
902
JennJennRN 🇺🇸 retweeted
Genius
How To Tell If Your Girlfriend Is A Spy:
4
59
1
202
5,312
JennJennRN 🇺🇸 retweeted
The risk of new escalation in the US-Israel war on #Iran is receding. Five reasons why: 1/5 Republican Defeat Trump’s party suffered a crushing midterm defeat, losing both chambers. Vance blamed the war itself. The electoral backlash has dramatically raised the political cost of further escalation for Trump.
19
56
7
292
106,316
JennJennRN 🇺🇸 retweeted
If the system is rigged, and you win anyway, that is your one and only chance to unrig it.
24
577
19
2,608
44,942
JennJennRN 🇺🇸 retweeted
I am BEGGING you... If you're not following Danny Citrinowicz for incredibly accurate and insightful analysis on the Iran War... You're missing out on the thoughts of the single best analyst on earth. He's absolutely the top person I would recommend following, hands down.
Iran After the Midterms: A Long-Term Iranian Victory Could Trigger a Short-Term Escalation I think we need to distinguish between the short-term and long-term implications of the US midterm elections. In the long run, Iran has achieved a significant strategic success. The blue wave has demonstrated something that every future American president will have to consider before launching another war against Tehran: Iran does not need to defeat the United States militarily to impose enormous economic and political costs on Washington. Disrupting global energy markets, driving up gasoline prices, and increasing the cost of living for ordinary Americans can ultimately have devastating political consequences. Once the new Congress takes office in January, pressure to end the war will increase significantly. Democrats will seek to use congressional oversight and funding restrictions to constrain Trump, although their ability to stop military operations will not be absolute. The political lesson of this war may influence American policy toward Iran for years to come. But in the short term, the situation may actually become more dangerous. Tehran feels strengthened by the election results. It has little incentive to make major concessions, particularly regarding the Strait of Hormuz, frozen Iranian funds, and its ability to export oil. Iran was unwilling to surrender before the elections, and it certainly has no reason to do so now. This leaves Trump with several difficult options. He can walk away without a meaningful agreement, but that would hardly look like victory. He can accept some Iranian demands regarding Hormuz to open the door to nuclear negotiations. Or he can continue the current pressure campaign, hoping Tehran will eventually blink. The problem with the third option is that the current situation is not static. It is an ongoing military confrontation with considerable potential for escalation. Iranian attacks on oil tankers, followed by recurring American strikes inside Iran, create a dangerous cycle of action and retaliation. Every additional night of American attacks increases the possibility of a stronger Iranian response. The potential expansion of attacks against regional energy infrastructure, including the recent strike on the Khor Mor gas field, adds another dimension to this danger. Meanwhile, the substantial concentration of American military forces in the region raises another possibility: Trump may be preparing for one final escalation, hoping that a powerful strike will either force Iran into an agreement or allow him to declare victory and end the war. But what happens if Iran responds by escalating further rather than surrendering? That is the fundamental question Washington still has not answered. There is also a danger of Iranian miscalculation. Tehran may interpret the Democratic victory as evidence that Trump is increasingly constrained and therefore underestimate his willingness to use military force. At the same time, Trump may believe that one more major strike can restore American leverage without triggering a wider conflict. Both assumptions could prove dangerously wrong. Netanyahu remains another important factor. Although politically weakened, he is still Israel's prime minister and continues to press Trump for additional military action, offering Israeli support for another campaign. He also understands that a change of government in Israel could close this window of opportunity. And this brings us to the central paradox: Iran's political success in the US midterms could actually increase the risk of military escalation before January. The elections may have accelerated the political end of the war, but they have not eliminated the possibility of one final, potentially devastating confrontation. Trump still needs something he can present as victory. Iran will not surrender. And the daily cycle of attacks and retaliation makes it increasingly difficult for either side to control the escalation. The war may be approaching its political end, but its most dangerous military phase could still lie ahead. #Iran #iran
52
154
1,194
171,690
Iran After the Midterms: A Long-Term Iranian Victory Could Trigger a Short-Term Escalation I think we need to distinguish between the short-term and long-term implications of the US midterm elections. In the long run, Iran has achieved a significant strategic success. The blue wave has demonstrated something that every future American president will have to consider before launching another war against Tehran: Iran does not need to defeat the United States militarily to impose enormous economic and political costs on Washington. Disrupting global energy markets, driving up gasoline prices, and increasing the cost of living for ordinary Americans can ultimately have devastating political consequences. Once the new Congress takes office in January, pressure to end the war will increase significantly. Democrats will seek to use congressional oversight and funding restrictions to constrain Trump, although their ability to stop military operations will not be absolute. The political lesson of this war may influence American policy toward Iran for years to come. But in the short term, the situation may actually become more dangerous. Tehran feels strengthened by the election results. It has little incentive to make major concessions, particularly regarding the Strait of Hormuz, frozen Iranian funds, and its ability to export oil. Iran was unwilling to surrender before the elections, and it certainly has no reason to do so now. This leaves Trump with several difficult options. He can walk away without a meaningful agreement, but that would hardly look like victory. He can accept some Iranian demands regarding Hormuz to open the door to nuclear negotiations. Or he can continue the current pressure campaign, hoping Tehran will eventually blink. The problem with the third option is that the current situation is not static. It is an ongoing military confrontation with considerable potential for escalation. Iranian attacks on oil tankers, followed by recurring American strikes inside Iran, create a dangerous cycle of action and retaliation. Every additional night of American attacks increases the possibility of a stronger Iranian response. The potential expansion of attacks against regional energy infrastructure, including the recent strike on the Khor Mor gas field, adds another dimension to this danger. Meanwhile, the substantial concentration of American military forces in the region raises another possibility: Trump may be preparing for one final escalation, hoping that a powerful strike will either force Iran into an agreement or allow him to declare victory and end the war. But what happens if Iran responds by escalating further rather than surrendering? That is the fundamental question Washington still has not answered. There is also a danger of Iranian miscalculation. Tehran may interpret the Democratic victory as evidence that Trump is increasingly constrained and therefore underestimate his willingness to use military force. At the same time, Trump may believe that one more major strike can restore American leverage without triggering a wider conflict. Both assumptions could prove dangerously wrong. Netanyahu remains another important factor. Although politically weakened, he is still Israel's prime minister and continues to press Trump for additional military action, offering Israeli support for another campaign. He also understands that a change of government in Israel could close this window of opportunity. And this brings us to the central paradox: Iran's political success in the US midterms could actually increase the risk of military escalation before January. The elections may have accelerated the political end of the war, but they have not eliminated the possibility of one final, potentially devastating confrontation. Trump still needs something he can present as victory. Iran will not surrender. And the daily cycle of attacks and retaliation makes it increasingly difficult for either side to control the escalation. The war may be approaching its political end, but its most dangerous military phase could still lie ahead. #Iran #iran
The risk of new escalation in the US-Israel war on #Iran is receding. Five reasons why: 1/5 Republican Defeat Trump’s party suffered a crushing midterm defeat, losing both chambers. Vance blamed the war itself. The electoral backlash has dramatically raised the political cost of further escalation for Trump.
41
191
21
870
241,292