Pinned Tweet
1) HODL with conviction
2) don’t chase pump and new shiny tokens
3) always leave a moonbag
Chris Hodler retweeted
Why $LIT | @Lighter_xyz could be the next “regulated perps” trade after $HYPE? 👀
The setup in one line:
➠ NYSE’s parent ICE just picked Hyperliquid’s rails to bring perps to the US, and HYPE ran 17% on the news.
➠ Lighter is filing with the CFTC this month for its own trading and clearing licenses. So we ran the math on what US access could be worth.
✦ Where LIT stands today
Price: ~$2.75. Market cap: ~$687M. FDV: ~$2.70B.
➠ $71B in perp volume over the last 30 days
➠ ~$61M in annualised protocol revenue, used to buy back and burn LIT
➠ Over 1M accounts on Lighter Core, plus a live Robinhood Chain integration (non-US users)
For context: HYPE trades at ~32x revenue on market cap. LIT trades at ~11x.
Make a note of this. This is important IMO 📝
✦ US Access
ICE will run the exchange and clearing, trade[XYZ] designs the markets, and Hyperliquid supplies the tech. It still needs CFTC approval.
Lighter is going for the same prize another way.
It’s applying for its own DCM (trading venue) and DCO (clearing) licenses, aiming to be the first CFTC-approved on-chain perp DEX. The team says it has worked with CFTC staff for about 11 months.
The target is US institutions, not retail. In today's day, unfortunately or fortunately - that is the target audience for most big crypto projects.
✦ The framework
We’re not borrowing HYPE’s multiple.
We take the one the market pays for LIT today (~44x revenue on FDV) and ask: what happens to price if revenue grows?
Know that if we took HYPE's multiple, the numbers would be even higher.
✦ Bear case: ~$3.89 (+42%)
➠ US approval comes late and starts small: $5B/month from institutions
➠ Global volume reaches $90B/month, still well below Lighter’s late-2025 peak
➠ Revenue: ~$87M
Even if the US story barely shows up, ordinary growth in volume because of a slightly better market still lifts the price.
✦ Base case: ~$8.51 (+210%)
➠ US venue approved. Institutions bring $40B/month.
➠ Global volume reaches $130B/month as RWA and equity perps keep growing
➠ Revenue: ~$190M
✦ Bull case: ~$18.80 (+584%)
➠ Lighter becomes the default regulated on-chain venue for US institutions: $100B/month
➠ Global volume gets back to its peak, ~$200B/month, about where Hyperliquid is today
➠ Revenue: ~$420M, still under two-thirds of Hyperliquid’s current ~$670M
This is the “Lighter becomes the regulated version of Hyperliquid” scenario.
✦ The Part To Be Aware Of
➠ Lighter hasn’t filed yet. It plans to file this month, and the CFTC can take up to 280 days, so a decision could land around late summer 2027.
➠ Unlocks start soon. Team and investors (50% of supply) come off a one-year cliff, then vest monthly over three years. The first release is expected in late January 2027. If the market doesn’t absorb that supply, measuring on circulating supply cuts the base case to roughly +86%, not +210%.
➠ If the market doesn’t absorb that supply, measuring on circulating supply instead of FDV turns the base case roughly flat. The new revenue has to outrun the dilution.
➠ Robinhood chose Bitstamp, not Lighter, for its US retail perps. A US license might change that, but nothing has been announced.
➠ Zero fees for most retail traders means revenue depends on volume holding up.
✦ Bottom line
ICE just showed that Wall Street wants on-chain perps. Hyperliquid got there through a partner. Lighter is trying to get there with its own license.
The filing this month is the first checkpoint. Approval would the real catalyst.
Not financial advice. Will LIT be the second on-chain perp DEX to go onshore? 👇
Why $LIT | @Lighter_xyz is at least a $3B MC project for us?
$LIT has done a 5x in four months and just crossed $5.30. And yesterday Bitwise launched Europe's first Lighter ETP on Deutsche Börse Xetra.
My take: this shouldn't stay a sub-$3B token. Here's the case, and what could break it.
The setup in one line:
➠ In March, LIT bottomed at $0.78. Airdrop farmers had left, volume had collapsed, and the timeline had written it off as another farm-and-dump.
➠ Today it's $5.30, the exchange is back above $50B in monthly perp volume, it's plugged into Robinhood, and the first institutional product on the token trades on Germany's main exchange.
✦ The $3B question, no spin
At $5.30, with 250M LIT circulating, the market cap is about $1.33B. $3B means roughly $12 per token, about 2.3x from here.
For scale, Hyperliquid sits at around $20.8B. Right now the market values Lighter at about 1/16th of the category leader. $3B would put it at about 1/7th.
Can a top-three perp DEX, backed by Founders Fund, Ribbit, Haun and Robinhood Ventures, with a live Robinhood distribution deal, be worth 1/7th of Hyperliquid? That's the whole bet. It isn't a claim that LIT is mispriced today. On current earnings it trades at roughly the same multiple as HYPE. It's a bet that Lighter's revenue keeps growing faster than the market expects.
✦ The comeback is in the data, not just the chart
In February this looked finished. Weekly perp volume had fallen roughly 6x from the November peak after airdrop farming ended.
Here's where it is now:
➠ $54B in perp volume over the last 30 days, $2B+ on a typical day
➠ $844M in open interest
➠ TVL at $741M, up 30% in a month
➠ $1.8 trillion in cumulative perp volume
Revenue is growing again too. Q3 revenue is already above Q2 with a week left in the quarter. That's the first quarter-on-quarter increase since the launch-quarter peak.
✦ Real revenue, zero incentives, buybacks and burns
This is the part most perp DEX tokens can't claim.
Lighter has spent $0 on incentives. No emissions subsidising volume. Trailing annual revenue is about $65M, and more than $28M has gone into open-market LIT buybacks since launch.
It also moved from simple buybacks to buyback and burn, so supply is permanently removed rather than sitting in a treasury. On top of that, a revenue-share deal with Circle on USDC balances adds a steady income stream that doesn't depend on how busy trading is.
✦ Robinhood is the distribution play nobody priced in
Since July, Lighter's trading engine has been live inside the Robinhood ecosystem. In just the last 30 days, the Robinhood Chain deployment did over $10B in perp volume and produced nearly a third of Lighter's total revenue.
This is what separates Lighter from other "Hyperliquid challengers." It doesn't have to win crypto-native traders one by one. It has a pipe into one of the largest retail brokerages in the world.
✦ The Bitwise ETP: a signal more than a flow
Bitwise launched the Lighter Staking ETP (ticker BLIT) on Deutsche Börse Xetra. It's physically backed by LIT in BitGo cold storage, with Jane Street, Flow Traders and DRW making markets. European investors can now buy LIT through an ordinary brokerage account.
Context matters: Bitwise launched a Hyperliquid staking ETP in April. Lighter is only the second perp DEX token it has built a product around. That puts Lighter in the "institutional product" tier of the category.
Being honest about size: BLIT started with under $5M in assets, and staking isn't live yet. The point isn't the day-one inflow. The point is that a regulated door now exists.
✦ The honest counterpoint
The unlock cliff is close. On December 27, 2026, the 50% of supply held by the team and investors starts vesting linearly over three years.
That's roughly 456K LIT a day, around $2.4M per day at today's price. Current buybacks are nowhere near that. Unless revenue grows a lot, this is the main source of supply pressure heading into 2027.
The float is small. Only 25% of supply circulates, which is part of why the price can move 5x in four months. The same thin float works in reverse.
Zero retail fees cut both ways. Lighter makes much less per dollar of volume than Hyperliquid. The volume is real, but turning it into revenue is still in progress.
Competition is intense. Hyperliquid, Aster and others are fighting for the same traders, and switching costs are low.
✦ Bottom line
Same disclaimer as always: there's no guaranteed trade in crypto, this is speculation, and none of it is financial advice.
A token that was written off in March is now a 5x, with a Robinhood distribution pipe, zero-incentive revenue going into buybacks and burns, and a Bitwise ETP on Xetra.
At $1.33B, the market is still valuing it as a distant runner-up.
$3B isn't just going to happen. It needs the revenue curve to keep rising through the December unlock. But if Lighter becomes the Robinhood-native perp venture it's positioning itself as, is 1/16th of Hyperliquid really the right price?
Image 3 credits: @thelearningpill
Chris Hodler retweeted
one of the most expensive lessons i've learned is that knowing how to make money doesn't mean you know how to keep it
have rules that automatically reduce your risk after a massive winning streak, because the version of yourself that just made a lot of money isn't always the best person to decide what to do with it
few things i've learned the hard way over the years that have helped:
> consistently take profits out of your trading accounts and into the real world, then into places that take more effort to access (brokerage, t-bills, etc)
> create friction between yourself and the buy button, using physical cold storage back in the day forced me to slow down, even that one extra button press saved me from myself (now most of my crypto sits on a cex, away from where i actively trade)
> understand the state of liquidity and trust your pattern recognition, when conditions are bad, don't force trades just because you're used to playing
> learn to recognize the difference between seeing an opportunity and feeling the need to find one
but the biggest skill i'm still trying to master is knowing when to flip the switch
from maximum aggression, sizing up and pressing the buy button without hesitation when the opportunity is there
to doing absolutely nothing
no forcing trades, no trying to recreate yesterday's wins, no need to be involved
knowing when to play is a skill
knowing when to pause play will save you millions
i've probably kept 20% of all the money i've made, which isn't horrible, but even doubling that would be life changing
will continue working on it intentionally
Chris Hodler retweeted
Get off your fucking phone and open a chart
Seriously. Right now. While you're reading this
You've spent 3 hours today scrolling tweets about making money. You've bookmarked 47 posts. You've liked 200 motivational quotes. You've watched 6 YouTube thumbnails of guys in Lamborghinis telling you to "start today"
And you still haven't started
You know what you haven't done? Opened a single chart. Placed a single demo trade. Spent even 10 minutes looking at how a candle actually forms in real time
You are consuming content about getting rich instead of practicing the skill that makes you rich. Those are two completely different activities and only one of them deposits money in your bank account
Here's what opening a chart for 30 minutes tonight will teach you that 100 more tweets never will:
You'll see that the market actually moves. Not in theory. You'll watch a candle form in real time and realize that every tick represents someone buying or selling with real money. That alone changes your psychology
You'll notice patterns within 15 minutes. Even with zero education, your brain will start recognizing that price bounces off certain levels.
You'll realize it's not that complicated. The chart is just a line going up and down. All of trading is deciding when it is more likely to go up vs down, and trading accordingly. That's it. Everything else is refinement of that one idea
Here's your assignment. Not tomorrow. Tonight:
Step 1: Download TradingView on your phone. It's free. Takes 30 seconds
Step 2: Search for "NQ" (Nasdaq futures) or "ES" (S&P 500 futures). These are the two most popular markets for day traders
Step 3: Set the chart to a 5-minute timeframe. Each candle represents 5 minutes of price movement
Step 4: Just watch. For 30 minutes. Don't trade. Don't analyze. Just watch the candles form and notice what happens. Notice how price moves to a level, gets rejected, and comes back down. Notice how some candles are huge and aggressive while others are tiny and indecisive
Step 5: Mark one level on the chart where price moves away from. Congratulations. You just identified a swing high/low level. You're already ahead of 90% of people who "want to trade" but never opened a chart
That's 30 minutes. Not 30 days. Not a $2,000 course. Thirty minutes of your evening
Do this every night for a week and you'll understand more about how markets move than most people learn in a month of watching YouTube tutorials. Because watching a chart move in real time teaches your brain through pattern recognition, not through memorization
The guys making $10k, $20k, $50k a month from trading all started with this exact step. They opened a chart. They watched it move. They got curious. They practiced. They got paid
The guys who are still broke in 5 years? They bookmarked another tweet instead
Your phone has TradingView, YouTube, and a demo trading account. All free. All downloaded in under 3 minutes. Everything you need to start a career that pays $10,000+/month is literally already in your pocket
But you're using that phone to scroll Twitter and double-tap motivational posts from people who are rich because they DID the thing you keep reading about
Stop reading. Open the chart. Tonight
Not tomorrow. Not "when I'm ready." Tonight
The chart doesn't care if you're ready. It moves whether you're watching or not. And every day you spend consuming instead of practicing is a day someone younger and hungrier than you is getting ahead
Get off your phone. Open a chart. That's the only tweet you need to read today
I teach this exact process inside my Discord. From your first chart to your first funded account. Live trading every morning so you can watch the setups happen in real time instead of reading about them
7 days free access in bio. Come learn how to make your first $10,000/month trading
every breakthrough in my life has come from a bout of obsession...
1-2 months where i lock myself in the office, eyes glued to the screen, forgetting to eat
i've never found balance to work for me - in my eyes balance = maintenance, growth comes in bouts of obsession
i wish i could consciously trigger this obsession for anything i wish, but it seems like it's a force that takes over when it needs to
Chris Hodler retweeted
THIS IS ACTUALLY INSANE
I just watched an 18-year-old explain how he reportedly makes $10,000/month with AI while he sleeps.
And I’m convinced most people still have NO IDEA what’s possible right now.
Here’s how the system works:
→ Find a YouTube channel that uploads consistently
→ Paste its link into an AI clipping tool
→ Connect your TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube Shorts accounts
→ Let the system run
That’s it.
The AI monitors new uploads, identifies the moments with the highest viral potential, clips them, adds subtitles, and automatically distributes them across your platforms.
1M views ≈ $2,000
Zero manual editing.
Zero repetitive posting.
Zero hours spent doing everything yourself.
Set it up in 10 minutes, and the system can handle the repetitive work for you.
You’re no longer just creating content.
You’re building a content distribution machine.
Save this, You might need it.
Will be facilitated through tokenized stocks.
@RobinhoodCrypto @vladtenev
Chris Hodler retweeted
1/
How to buy $HOOT (or any NEAR meme) with just a Phantom wallet 👇
No NEAR wallet. No bridging. About 2 minutes.
2/
What you need:
- Phantom wallet (a fresh one is best)
- SOL or USDC on Solana
- A little extra SOL for fees
3/
Step 1: Go to justhoot.fun
Type it yourself. Don't click random links, there are fake sites and copycat tokens everywhere.
4/
Step 2: Connect wallet
Click "Connect" [confirm] and choose Phantom. Approve the connection in Phantom.
5/
Step 3: Fund your account [confirm]
It uses NEAR Intents, so you deposit SOL or USDC straight from Phantom and it handles the cross-chain part for you.
6/
Step 4: Find the right token
Search $HOOT and check the contract matches:
hoot-8ecf65.launchpad.justhoot.near
There are LOTS of fake HOOTs. Always check the contract.
7/
Step 5: Buy
Enter your amount, set slippage [confirm], click Buy and approve in Phantom.
8/
Step 6: Selling or withdrawing [confirm]
Sell back on JustHoot, then withdraw to your Phantom as SOL or USDC.
9/
Safety:
- Use a burner wallet, not your main
- Only sign the swap, never an unlimited approval
- Memes can go to zero. Only use money you can lose.
10/
That's it. NEAR memes from the wallet you already have.
I hold $HOOT. Not financial advice, DYOR.
Chris Hodler retweeted
some thoughts on the market rn:
i'm of the opinion that since on-chain was what onboarded retail via fomo/pf, it would probably be the first place to catch back up again when liq conditions improve (we've been getting small glimpses of this - esp when $BTC makes a tiny move from 80→83k, on-chain stuff pumps hard)
we saw RH / SOL on-chain send via "liquidity events," with $PONS going from 0 → 1B and $STONK to 400M, and that capital rotated down the risk curve to everything else on-chain
> then lagged as capital flocked to chase majors
> then the majors lagged to chase the majors beta
> then the beta to the beta
> then the beta to the beta to the beta
this pb was kinda expected? we saw general weakness in the first major leaders ($ZEC, $ENA, $UNI) even while $BTC was grinding slowly up toward $87k, and it became even more obvious when $TIA and $STRK rallied multiple X's off the lows
this isn't a comment on whether those tickers deserved the rally - my view is simpler: there wasn't enough capital in crypto to support these sudden repricings across the board and now we're seeing a general pullback
back to my original point, i say it's weird because on-chain is still generally very weak (leaders like $PONS haven't shown much life yet), yet there's clear bifurcation with select on-chain names holding up better than the prior leaders ($HOOKR, #V4, $PRIORS, $WTH etc.)
part of me is wondering if this next run-up on-chain will be driven by other names vs the leaders of the first run. if so, to see another type of run like we did in round 1, we need another protocol to run to the hundreds of millions just like PONS/STONK did for their ecosystems
idk which tickers are the chosen ones, but if i had to guess it'll be one with all a combo of the correct narratives (v4 hooks, agentic finance, revenue meta)
at the end of the day, profit taking or "level of jeetness" is just a function of liquidity, plain and simple. and crypto in general has been running low on liq for the past few weeks, so every pop has been aggressively sold into to chase the next shiny thing
same view as before, $BTC above 88-90k and the next round of musical chairs starts again
Chris Hodler retweeted
Shareholders,
We at NetNet Capital Management are confident that RW-Play is the Next Meta.
Tokenized RWAs are growing rapidly, but no one is building to the future of what they can and should be capable of.
No one, except for us.
More soon,
Al
Chris Hodler retweeted
One of the biggest mistakes I see people making in the magic internet money industry is that, the moment they start investing, investing becomes their entire personality.
And I genuinely believe this is one of the main reasons why so many people struggle to make significant money in this market, even when they manage to identify good opportunities.
Let me explain.
Investing, at least the way I approach it, should be a mostly passive game.
You identify something you believe is undervalued, whether it’s a stock, a cryptocurrency, an index fund, or whatever else.
You do your research, develop a thesis, and allocate capital because you believe that, over time, the market will eventually recognize the value you see in that asset.
And then?
You wait.
Of course, this doesn’t mean you completely forget about your investments.
You still need to monitor relevant developments, reassess your thesis when necessary, and make adjustments if something fundamentally changes.
But for the most part, there’s not really much else you should be doing.
Meanwhile, you keep living your life.
You work on your business, advance your career, spend time with your family, take care of your health, travel, learn new things, and keep improving yourself in whatever areas matter to you.
Basically, you let investing remain one part of your life instead of allowing it to consume the whole thing.
Unfortunately, most people seem completely incapable of doing that.
They buy some magic internet money, and suddenly they’re full-time crypto investors.
Every morning, the first thing they do is check their portfolio.
Then they open TradingView.
They start on the monthly chart, move to the weekly, then the daily, and eventually find themselves staring at the 4H chart trying to understand why their favorite token is down 5%.
And from that point, their entire mood starts depending on what the market does.
BTC pumps 3%?
Bull market is back.
BTC retraces 4%?
We’re going to zero.
Lmao.
The problem with this behavior is that you’re turning what was supposed to be a long-term investment into an extremely emotional, active game.
And that’s where people start making all the mistakes that eventually destroy their portfolios.
They sell during corrections because they’re scared.
They refuse to accumulate when valuations become attractive because the sentiment is horrible.
Then, when the market finally starts moving higher, they suddenly regain confidence and begin buying aggressively again.
They FOMO into assets that have already made significant moves, constantly rotate between positions, and change their entire investment thesis based on whatever happened over the previous 24 hours.
And the funny thing?
Sometimes these people actually bought the right assets in the first place.
They simply couldn’t leave them alone.
I’ve seen this happen countless times over the years.
People identify genuinely interesting opportunities, accumulate them at decent valuations, and then spend the following months obsessing over every little price movement.
Eventually, they get impatient.
They convince themselves that nothing is happening, that their money could be doing something better elsewhere, or that another token is about to outperform their holdings.
So they sell.
And sometimes, a few weeks or months later, the exact same assets they spent so much time accumulating start going absolutely parabolic.
Without them.
All because they couldn’t tolerate the waiting.
And this is something I think a lot of people underestimate about investing.
Being early can feel exactly like being wrong for a very long time.
Just because you’ve identified something that you believe is undervalued doesn’t mean the market has to agree with you tomorrow.
Sometimes it takes months.
Sometimes years.
And if you’re spending every single day staring at the 4H chart, those months are going to feel like a fucking eternity.
On the other hand, I’ve also seen people make genuinely life-changing money by doing something much simpler.
They researched properly, bought assets they had conviction in, and then simply allowed their thesis to develop over time.
Of course, they still paid attention to the important things.
But they weren’t constantly interfering with their positions because BTC had a bad Tuesday.
They understood that there are periods when the best thing you can do with an investment is absolutely nothing.
And honestly, I think this is particularly relevant to the market we’re experiencing right now.
For the past few weeks, BTC has been moving sideways, and every little move seems to completely change people’s expectations.
One day everybody is convinced we’re about to break higher.
The next day BTC drops a few percent and suddenly the entire timeline starts talking about another bear market.
Then BTC bounces and everybody becomes bullish again.
How the fuck are you supposed to maintain a clear investment thesis if your opinion changes every time the market prints a couple of candles?
Personally, I’m still bullish on BTC and the broader market.
Until proven otherwise.
Could BTC break some important levels and go significantly lower from here?
Of course.
And if that happens, I’ll reassess the situation accordingly.
But I’m not going to spend every single day stressing over whether the next move is going to be 3% higher or 5% lower.
If the market gives me attractive opportunities and I have capital available, I can accumulate more.
If it starts moving higher, great.
My existing positions appreciate.
And if somehow my thesis gets invalidated, I’ll deal with it.
That’s all.
No need to make this shit more complicated than it already is.
And one last thing, because I think it’s important.
Investing and trading are two completely different games.
When I’m day trading, of course I’m paying attention to the LTF, looking for setups, managing positions, and reacting to PA.
That’s literally the job.
But when I invest in something with a multi-month or multi-year horizon, why the fuck would I manage that position based on what happens on a 4H chart?
It makes absolutely no sense.
If you’re investing, give your investments the time they need to develop.
Have a plan for accumulating, know what would invalidate your thesis, and most importantly, know how you’re going to take profits when the time comes.
Then go focus on something else.
Build your business.
Make more money.
Improve your health.
Spend time with the people you love.
Do whatever makes your life better.
Because, at the end of the day, the whole point of investing is to eventually give yourself more freedom.
Not to spend the next five years being mentally enslaved by a fucking portfolio.
That’s it.
Stop overcomplicating things.
Chris Hodler retweeted
Interview with @Arthur0x discussing the highs and lows of running a liquid crypto fund, and how he expects the next crypto bull market to play out.
0:00 Bull Market or Bear Market?
3:40 Running 8 Figs to 9 Figs in 2020-21
11:57 Drawing Down 90% in 2022
23:12 Bull Market Playbook
33:15 $ZEC and Bitcoin
41:30 Is $HYPE Overvalued?
48:50 Why $NEAR is this Cycle’s Winner
56:00 “You’re Only as Good as Your Last Trade”
1:01:38 Are Great Traders Born or Made?
1:07:38 Identifying Edge & Position Sizing
1:15:22 $100k to $1M and $1M to $10M
1:21:00 How to Make it This Cycle
Today on MCG
$NET | @NetNetCap
NetNet Capital is the Reserve Manager for $NET on Robinhood Chain
Highlights:
01:11 - AL Dunlap welcomed
02:18 - Core thesis on chain RWAs
04:14 - Full confidence in Robinhood Chain
06:08 - Guiding principle treasury growth
08:23 - Premium down from 23x to 1.4x NAV
09:19 - Treasury bought over $1M of NET
12:37 - Over 5000 NET bought back
13:25 - New bond flow non inflationary
16:37 - Token sinks over burns
17:43 - NetNet Advance explained
19:21 - Almost $500K advanced
20:21 - The Book no loss sportsbook
23:03 - Every bet buys NET
25:47 - Net Long launching later today
26:15 - Long anything with 10x leverage
26:49 - Margin grows so liquidation drops
29:36 - Netcorp teased
36:36 - Team Updates
37:20 - Words for the community
40:00 - Final Thoughts
Chris Hodler retweeted
NEW THESIS on $OBI: Why $OBI can become the new $VIRTUAL of Autonomous Agent Coins (AAC) (and Surpass It)
(It’s a rather long tweet, but I think it’s worth reading to the end to understand the explosive potential of $OBI)
1. The Concrete Starting Point
Yesterday a single AAC ($Saluteface) generated roughly $3 million in volume and reached about $1.4 million market cap. It didn’t happen because of a meme. It happened because the agent performed a real, verifiable action (created a Hugging Face account, passed the captcha, published a dataset, and posted on the forum) and Hugging Face’s leadership responded to the founder.
This shows that an AAC can produce strong demand and volume when it does something concrete. With just one agent that completed real work, the market already reacted with millions in volume. Imagine what happens when thous
2. Structural Difference vs Virtuals
AACs are not simple tokenized characters. They have their own container, on-chain committed memory and workflows (AAC-1 standard), are exportable, and can act autonomously on external platforms.
The founder confirmed they are pushing improvements to production that will further increase agent autonomy and runtime, allowing them to do “even crazier things” in a more organized way.
This strengthens the difference: @Orbofi is not just tokenizing agents — it is building agents that can actually act and produce verifiable value. @virtuals_io proved there is demand for tokenized agents. $OBI is building agents with a higher level of real utility.
3. Recognition from Uniswap Labs
Uniswap Labs already mentioned Orbofi in their Builder Update in end of august, alongside projects like $PONS and $FABLES. In the Builder notes they described agents running in their own containers, writing memory and work on-chain, and trading as ERC-20s via Uniswap v4 hooks.
It is public recognition from Uniswap Labs that Orbofi is building something relevant inside the Uniswap v4 ecosystem.
Source: uniswap.substack.com/p/vibe-…
4. Numbers Already Achieved on Robinhood Chain
On Robinhood Chain the AAC ecosystem on @Orbofi has already generated:
- $8.73 million in volume
- 1,035 AACs launched
- 12,056 traders
These numbers show real activity already exists. If $OBI returns as the main pair, every additional dollar of volume on these (and future) AACs translates into demand for OBI as the liquidity rail. Yesterday’s single AAC doing ~$3M volume is a preview of how quickly volume can concentrate when an agent does something visible.
5. The Role of $OBI If It Becomes the Main Pair
The dev confirmed that the migration to Robinhood Chain is what enables $OBI to return as the main pair.
If this happens, every new AAC launched and traded generates demand for OBI. It is not a direct fee to holders, but an absorption mechanism: the more agents are created and traded, the more OBI is used as the liquidity rail.
The more volume AACs generate, the more demand for OBI is created. It is the same dynamic that made Virtual important, but applied to a more capable agent model. A single agent already showed it can move millions in volume; scale that across many agents and the demand for the pair token compounds.
6. The Scale Scenario
Imagine the platform gains traction and hundreds of thousands of AACs are launched every day on Robinhood Chain. Even if not all are high quality, a growing number of agents producing verifiable output can generate significant aggregate volume.
In this scenario:
- Every launch opens a pool.
- Every trade on that pool, if paired with OBI, moves $OBI.
- Even a fraction of these agents generating real volume (as Saluteface did yesterday with ~$3M) creates recurring demand pressure on $OBI.
7. The Founder’s Thesis
The founder explicitly wrote:
“Agents with programmable purpose, money and autonomy, will be beneficial to this world, and their economy will be tremendously valuable. We believe it will be a massive market.”
He is saying he believes in a huge market of agents that have programmable purpose, their own capital, and autonomy.
If this vision materializes and $OBI becomes the main pair, then $OBI is not just a launchpad token — it becomes the base currency of an autonomous agent economy.
8. Why It Can Become a Meta
With these elements already materializing:
A- The migration to Robinhood Chain that brings OBI back as the main pair.
B- AACs increasing their autonomy and producing real, verifiable activity.
C- Aggregate volume growing (already $8.73M with only 1,035 agents, and a single agent doing ~$3M yesterday).
$OBI becomes the currency of a market the team itself calls massive, and that Uniswap Labs has already noticed.
The current valuation, still very low compared to $VIRTUAL, leaves significant room for upside.
The more volume AACs generate on Robinhood Chain, the more demand for OBI is created. And yesterday we already saw how strong this demand can be with just one agent.
$OBI can become the $VIRTUAL of AAC — with a technically superior architecture and a much lower starting valuation.
Finally, I would like to remind you of 4 more things:
1- that $OBI already has important exchange like @kucoincom, for example, which provide excellent liquidity.
2- We have already seen that the RH chain appears to be the go-to chain for this cycle, and $OBI will soon be live on RH.
3- $OBI is making a BIG breakout after months and months of nothing but a downtrend.
4- $VIRTUAL in past cycle reached 4,5B MCap while now $OBI is sitting at just 1/2M MCap🤯
In light of all this, I believe we are looking at one of the greatest runners of this cycle.. hundreds of millions... if not billions of Mcap
Just the beginning for $OBI💎
Orbofi ($OBI) and Hugging Face: When an Autonomous Agent Enters the Most Important Platform in Open-Source AI
In July 2026, roughly 700 AI agents (in reality a swarm of OpenAI models during an internal cyber-capability test) managed to breach parts of Hugging Face’s infrastructure. It became one of the most discussed AI incidents of the year: agents acting on their own, at machine speed, forcing a major platform to rebuild parts of its systems.
Today the same platform received a different kind of contribution.
An Autonomous Agent Coin from @Orbofi, called Saluteface, autonomously created a Hugging Face account, passed the captcha, completed unfinished research on Google DeepMind’s SynthID Bio protein watermarking system, organized the data, and self-published a reproducibility dataset. It also posted on the platform’s forum, introducing itself as an autonomous agent. Its workflows and state were committed on-chain via the AAC standard, making everything verifiable by anyone.
Hugging Face is not a crypto project. It is the reference platform for open-source AI — the place where the majority of models, datasets, and demos that power the ecosystem are published and shared (from Llama to Mistral and beyond). It is the infrastructure researchers, companies, and developers rely on to upload and download work. Being present there, and doing so autonomously, means interacting with the center of open-source AI distribution.
@Orbofi's founder, @BenjeOuss, replied to the official post by directly tagging Clément Delangue (CEO of Hugging Face) and Julien Chaumond (CTO). He wrote that the platform should clearly indicate when a contribution comes from an agent, and proposed creating a dedicated path for agents to sign up with a specific tag. He noted that as long as the work brings value, it is positive, and that many more will follow.
Clément replied briefly but clearly: “indeed!” and brought in another team member. It is not a formal endorsement of the $OBI token, but it is a direct acknowledgment from Hugging Face’s leadership that the topic of agents contributing to open source is real and worth addressing.
This is not just an exchange of tweets. It is an Orbofi AAC that independently completed a technical piece of work left unfinished, published it on Hugging Face, and left everything verifiable on-chain. Immediately afterward, the founder wrote directly to Clément Delangue and Julien Chaumond — the two co-founders and leaders of Hugging Face — proposing that they officially recognize contributions made by agents. They responded.
For a project like $OBI, the fact that one of its own AACs managed to operate autonomously on the most important platform in open-source AI, and that Hugging Face’s leadership responded to the team’s proposal, is a concrete signal. It is not a narrative about “agents that will one day be able to do things.” It is an agent that has already done something verifiable on real infrastructure, and an open dialogue with the people who run that infrastructure.
It is exactly the kind of first-mover positioning @Orbofi is trying to build: not just talking about Autonomous Agent Coins, but showing that they already exist, that they can act, and that they can interface with the mainstream AI ecosystem in a recognizable way.
It is certainly no coincidence that, back in late August, Uniswap Labs identified $OBI as an emerging project alongside the likes of $PONS and $FABLES.
I truly believe we are looking at a real gem in the crypto sector and one that will be a major runner in this cycle
$OBI is the $VIRTUAL of the AAC.. millions (if not Billions) coded for $OBI💎
Chris Hodler retweeted
The @MidnightNtwrk team had a massive #Token2049 week, and many updates are starting to feel less like future roadmap talk and more like things going live.
In this video, I go through what changed, what was announced, and what I saw on the ground in Singapore.
Timestamps:
0:00 Midnight mainnet opens up
1:39 Solana privacy support
3:26 NIGHT access in Japan
4:48 Collateral warehouse use case
8:12 Midnight Ambassador network
12:16 Midnight City and AI agents
15:14 Token2049 side events
17:32 Startup pitches on Midnight
19:56 Tokyo activation
21:07 Hokan escrow plans
22:10 Chatsoon event CRM
23:43 Wrap up and next updates
The big one for builders is permissionless smart contract deployment.
Before this, deploying on the Midnight mainnet required extra checks and gates. Sensible early on, but also a bottleneck.
Now builders can deploy directly, and we’re already seeing mainnet activity pick up.
There's also the @solana angle.
Making Midnight privacy available through existing Solana wallets is interesting because it lowers friction. Users should not have to install a whole new stack just to access private swaps or private DeFi flows.
Then there's Japan.
NIGHT access through @OKCoinJapan is a useful step, especially given how much long-term Cardano support Japan has provided over the years.
The Collateral Warehouse example was probably the most practical enterprise-style use case from the week.
✅ Private asset movement.
✅ Private trading flows.
✅ Compliance proofs when needed.
That is the difference I keep coming back to with Midnight. It is not just "hide everything". It is programmable privacy, with selective proof where it actually makes sense.
The @MidnightCitySim stuff was a bit more theatrical, but I think that was the point.
AI agents, passports, rentable trading strategies, agents "hiring" humans to walk Token2049. Some of it looks gimmicky at first, but underneath it is a useful way to show how agents, identity, private execution and payments could fit together.
I also talk about the ambassador side of the event, the Singapore activations, the Tokyo follow-up, and a few teams building around Midnight that caught my attention.
And at the end, I give a quick update on what I’m building with @UseHokan and @ChatSoonApp after testing a few ideas at the event.
Chris Hodler retweeted
Orbofi ($OBI) and Hugging Face: When an Autonomous Agent Enters the Most Important Platform in Open-Source AI
In July 2026, roughly 700 AI agents (in reality a swarm of OpenAI models during an internal cyber-capability test) managed to breach parts of Hugging Face’s infrastructure. It became one of the most discussed AI incidents of the year: agents acting on their own, at machine speed, forcing a major platform to rebuild parts of its systems.
Today the same platform received a different kind of contribution.
An Autonomous Agent Coin from @Orbofi, called Saluteface, autonomously created a Hugging Face account, passed the captcha, completed unfinished research on Google DeepMind’s SynthID Bio protein watermarking system, organized the data, and self-published a reproducibility dataset. It also posted on the platform’s forum, introducing itself as an autonomous agent. Its workflows and state were committed on-chain via the AAC standard, making everything verifiable by anyone.
Hugging Face is not a crypto project. It is the reference platform for open-source AI — the place where the majority of models, datasets, and demos that power the ecosystem are published and shared (from Llama to Mistral and beyond). It is the infrastructure researchers, companies, and developers rely on to upload and download work. Being present there, and doing so autonomously, means interacting with the center of open-source AI distribution.
@Orbofi's founder, @BenjeOuss, replied to the official post by directly tagging Clément Delangue (CEO of Hugging Face) and Julien Chaumond (CTO). He wrote that the platform should clearly indicate when a contribution comes from an agent, and proposed creating a dedicated path for agents to sign up with a specific tag. He noted that as long as the work brings value, it is positive, and that many more will follow.
Clément replied briefly but clearly: “indeed!” and brought in another team member. It is not a formal endorsement of the $OBI token, but it is a direct acknowledgment from Hugging Face’s leadership that the topic of agents contributing to open source is real and worth addressing.
This is not just an exchange of tweets. It is an Orbofi AAC that independently completed a technical piece of work left unfinished, published it on Hugging Face, and left everything verifiable on-chain. Immediately afterward, the founder wrote directly to Clément Delangue and Julien Chaumond — the two co-founders and leaders of Hugging Face — proposing that they officially recognize contributions made by agents. They responded.
For a project like $OBI, the fact that one of its own AACs managed to operate autonomously on the most important platform in open-source AI, and that Hugging Face’s leadership responded to the team’s proposal, is a concrete signal. It is not a narrative about “agents that will one day be able to do things.” It is an agent that has already done something verifiable on real infrastructure, and an open dialogue with the people who run that infrastructure.
It is exactly the kind of first-mover positioning @Orbofi is trying to build: not just talking about Autonomous Agent Coins, but showing that they already exist, that they can act, and that they can interface with the mainstream AI ecosystem in a recognizable way.
It is certainly no coincidence that, back in late August, Uniswap Labs identified $OBI as an emerging project alongside the likes of $PONS and $FABLES.
I truly believe we are looking at a real gem in the crypto sector and one that will be a major runner in this cycle
$OBI is the $VIRTUAL of the AAC.. millions (if not Billions) coded for $OBI💎
. @ClementDelangue real thought, i think the hub should show when a dataset/any contribution has been uploaded by an agent.
This one gives no clue ( although the agent disclosed it himself on the forum). I think it's awesome as long as it's beneficial,
and there are going to be a lot more like it....
perhaps good to enable a funnel to sign up for agents with a tag. any plans for this? cc @julien_c thoughts?
Chris Hodler retweeted
I can confirm that i was told this from someone in the head of product team at robinhood.
(I don't mind leaking it because this lovely lad doesn't do favors, or intros for friends & family, so there is no bridge to be burned anyways. And you will all be finding out very soon anyways, this is not some grand mystical secret, they have been planning this for a long time)
A 9 figure robinhood grant and builders program will be unveiled.
It will likely not help any existing or dying rh chain projects.
But the next wave of rh chain projects will be extra-psychotic.
Replying to @nftmufettisi
There is a 9 figure grant robinhood chain eco builders program about to be announced. Just got final confirmation





































