Jack Miller (@twrjack) header
Jack Miller (@twrjack) profile picture

Husband, father, grandfather; Calvary La Mirada OPC (RE); MA Biblical Counseling 1983 Grace Theological Seminary, Ps 25:14

Joined September 2021
Photo by Jack Miller (@twrjack)Photo by Jack Miller (@twrjack)Photo by Jack Miller (@twrjack)Photo by Jack Miller (@twrjack)Photo by Jack Miller (@twrjack)Photo by Jack Miller (@twrjack)Photo by Jack Miller (@twrjack)Photo by Jack Miller (@twrjack)Photo by Jack Miller (@twrjack)Photo by Jack Miller (@twrjack)
Sanctification by the Law
6
10
2
91
“I have been young, and now am old; Yet I have not seen the righteous forsaken, Nor his descendants begging bread. He is ever merciful, and lends; And his descendants are blessed” Psalm 37:25-26
4
60
Jack Miller retweeted
“I am persuaded that love and humility are the highest attainments in the school of Christ and the brightest evidences that He is indeed our Master.” (John Newton)
1
7
187
Jack Miller retweeted
You can’t win an argument with your husband or wife. Peterson’s point is simple. If you win, you’ve defeated your spouse, and you two are one, so you’ve defeated yourself. Now you live with someone who’s defeated and bitter. So what do you do if you’re the better arguer? Help your partner make their case. They might be right, and it’s in your interest to hear it. He connects this to loving your enemy and giving the devil his due. Being good at talking doesn’t make you correct, and stomping around insisting you’re right fixes nothing. One of the wisest things anyone has said about marriage.
59
346
22
2,299
101,141
Jack Miller retweeted
@TexasPreacher Antinomianism is the rejection of the moral law being the continued rule for the Christian life. Clark affirms the “third use” and has written at length on all aspects of the law (and the gospel). Your mislabeling of his refusal to ground our assurance in our works instead of Christ’s finished work is slandering, detracting, misconstructing intentions, words, and actions, raising false rumors, and evil suspicion (WLC 145). Either cite Scott’s rejection of God’s law (without telling me to buy your buddy’s 50 pg book) or retract in true repentance. Any other response, or lack of response, is deflection.
5
3
2
22
1,316
“faithfulness as the shape of gratitude inside an inheritance received, never as the price of the King's word”
Cheap Pastoring "Well done, good and faithful servant" is not an assignment. It is the commendation the Master speaks at his return, over servants who traded with what was his. And in the architecture of the covenant it has an address before it has an echo: "This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased" is the Father's commendation of the one faithful Servant, the Head in whose house every heir stands. The heirs will hear "well done" because they are in the One of whom it is eternally true. The word is a promise before it is anything else. Watch the standard pulpit operation performed on it. The commendation is lifted out of the return scene and reissued in the present tense as capacity: you cannot be perfect, but you can do well; you cannot force fruitfulness, but you can be faithful; it is within the reach of every Christian to please God with their life. Every clause sounds gentle. The operation underneath is a conversion — an eschatological promise transformed into a present imperative, the ground of the word quietly relocated from the Head's receipt to the hearer's reach. It is cheap pastoring, and the cheapness is exact. Grounding the commendation costs an architecture: the covenant of works and its faithful Vassal, the Pactum in which the Son undertook the house, the inheritance received whole by the heirs in Him. Skip the architecture and the application is free — for the preacher. The hearer pays the bill all week, measuring his reach against a commendation that was never placed within it, and coming up either despairing or self-satisfied. Both are the covenant of works administered to the heirs of grace, in a gentle voice. Preached as the Scripture gives it, the "well done" sends no one home to earn it. It sends the household to its work as men and women who live under a commendation already secured by their Head — faithfulness as the shape of gratitude inside an inheritance received, never as the price of the King's word. A promise preached as an imperative is the law with the sanctions removed and the demand left standing. That is not the gospel applied. It is the gospel replaced. #Matthew25 #Preaching #CovenantTheology #Kline #SecondAdam
1
62
Given this would take both houses voting for this (60 votes in the Senate) how do you propose to push this through?
The national debt now costs $362,000 per taxpayer. The way to address this crisis is with the Six Penny Plan. Make even, across-the-board cuts, and we will balance the budget in 5 years. It’s that simple.
1
168
Yes, we need a much more Christocentric reading of the Psalter before immediately leaping to our own piety—which does describe us in union with him. They are the prayers of Christ, after all. It would clear up a lot of confusion.
Why must we choose between Christ’s perfect righteousness and the believer’s obligation to pursue righteousness? Psalm 15 does not begin by asking how believers ought to behave, but who may dwell in God’s holy presence. Psalm 24 asks essentially the same question: Who shall ascend the hill of the Lord? Who shall stand in his holy place? Surely we ought to ask who ultimately satisfies these qualifications before reducing the passage to a prescription for Christian piety. Christ’s fulfillment of the righteousness described in these psalms does not negate their ethical demands upon believers. But neither do those ethical demands negate their fulfillment in Christ. There is no one who has ascended the hill of the Lord on the basis of his own obedience save the Lord Jesus Christ. He alone has clean hands and a pure heart in the fullest sense. This does not negate the believer’s obligation to pursue holiness, but neither should we confuse the righteousness by which we are accepted before God with the righteousness that necessarily follows from that acceptance. Why must Christ’s fulfillment of these psalms be set against their application to Christian piety? “For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments. And his commandments are not burdensome. For everyone who has been born of God overcomes the world. And this is the victory that has overcome the world—our faith. Who is it that overcomes the world except the one who believes that Jesus is the Son of God?” 1 John 5:3-5
4
7
43
1,416
Jack Miller retweeted
Read Colossians 2:11–12 in the Greek and the sentence will not split. It is one sentence. Every verb is passive: περιετμήθητε, you were circumcised; συνταφέντες, buried with Him; συνηγέρθητε, raised with Him. The Colossians perform none of it. They receive all of it, and all of it is located ἐν ᾧ — in Him. Two συν-compound verbs weld their burial and their resurrection to Christ. Regeneration in verse 11 and baptism in verse 12, two events in two subjects, is a reading imposed on the punctuation of English translations. Paul's syntax knows one movement in one place: in Christ. "The circumcision of Christ" is Christ's. Paul calls it ἀχειροποίητος, made without hands — Daniel's word for the stone cut without hands that shatters the kingdoms (Dan 2:34), the Lord's word for the temple made without hands that is His risen body (Mark 14:58). The register is God's own climactic deed, not an inward experience. And Paul defines the event himself, in this same letter: the stripping off is ἐν τῇ ἀπεκδύσει τοῦ σώματος τῆς σαρκός, "in the putting off of the body of the flesh." In 1:22 that phrase is Christ's — reconciliation accomplished "in the body of His flesh through death." The rare root appears once more, at 2:15, where Christ at the cross is the one stripping — ἀπεκδυσάμενος — the rulers and authorities. Body of flesh, stripping, cross: Paul's vocabulary locates the circumcision of Christ where Kline located it, in the covenant cutting executed on the federal Head. Baptism seals to the believer what was cut away on Christ. "Through faith" will not do the work assigned to it either. Grammatically it hangs on the raising: συνηγέρθητε διὰ τῆς πίστεως τῆς ἐνεργείας τοῦ θεοῦ — raised through faith in the working of God who raised Him. The baptism clause carries no faith condition; Paul simply addresses baptized people and tells them where their burial and resurrection lie. Faith in this sentence is the hand that receives the benefit, and faith has never been the sign's gate in either administration. Circumcision sealed the righteousness of faith to a household whose infants exercised none (Rom 4:11; Gen 17). The sign follows the promise's address, and the address never changed: "to you and to your offspring" becomes "the promise is for you and for your children" (Gen 17:7; Acts 2:39). Kline assumes nothing here. The administration itself assigns the sign. On 1 Corinthians 7:14: Paul's word for the children is ἅγιος, holy — the covenant's own consecration vocabulary, the status of a people set apart inside the administration. And the mixed administration rests on texts, not appearances. Hebrews 10:29 speaks of a man sanctified by the blood of the covenant who then profanes it. The standing is real, it is covenantal, and the man perishes under eschatological judgment. The new covenant community in its visible administration is wider than the elect because its own apostasy texts say so. Every step of the counter-reading runs on one equation: covenant membership equals election, and the sign therefore waits on regeneration. That equation is the subject of the post. Restating it does not answer it. #Colossians2 #Paedobaptism #Baptism #CovenantTheology #Kline #SecondAdam
4
1
37
2,149
Crazy(?) but true… “Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard.” H. L. Mencken
2
161
Anglicans hurt the most…
Despite my best efforts, it seems Queen Elizabeth I is NOT going to be elected Governor of Ohio😪
1
151
As election results come in it’s helpful to remember…
Replying to @FHodler2
"Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance." - H. L. Mencken
3
263
Jack Miller retweeted
I arrived at Westminster Seminary California a convinced Baptist. I left a paedobaptist. Meredith Kline did it, and he did it on three points I could not answer. First, the new covenant is broader than the elect. Its visible administration encompasses more than the finally saved. Men can stand within it, receive its signs, sit under its ministry, enjoy its privileges, and yet never embrace Christ in saving faith. That is not an exception. It is the Bible's own picture from Israel to the warnings of Hebrews. Second, baptism is the sign of the new covenant. The sign belongs to the covenant as God administers it in history. It marks membership in the visible covenant community, not infallible knowledge of election hidden in the decree. Third, the children of believers belong to that covenant community. The promise runs to believers and their children as it always has. Paul calls them holy (1 Cor. 7:14), not because they are presumed regenerate, but because they belong to the holy people God has set apart in history. Then Paul presses the point further in Ephesians 6. Writing to a Gentile church, he addresses the children directly: Honor your father and your mother. And he gives them the covenant promise attached to the command: that it may go well with you. This is remarkable. Paul does not treat the children of the church as outsiders awaiting admission. He takes a covenant command from the Decalogue and administers it directly to them as their command. Nor does he discard the promise attached to it. Under the Mosaic economy, the promise was expressed in terms of life in the land, a typological inheritance pointing beyond itself. Writing to a predominantly Gentile congregation outside that land, Paul does not abandon the promise. He carries it forward into its eschatological fulfillment. The land type has yielded to the greater inheritance, but the promise still belongs to the covenant children to whom he writes. A covenant stipulation given through Moses is administered by an apostle to the children of the new covenant church, complete with its promise transformed from type to antitype. Canon to covenant, command to promise, and the line never breaks. Put those three points together and the Baptist fence cannot stand. I had built it on a single equation: covenant membership equals election. Kline broke the equation. Once covenant membership was distinguished from election, the rest followed. The sign belongs to the covenant. The children belong to the covenant. Therefore the sign belongs to the children. I did not change tribes. I learned to see the covenant whole. #Paedobaptism #Baptism #CovenantTheology #Kline #Ephesians6 #SecondAdam
86
63
16
495
51,338
Hmm, interesting…
Calif has now lost control of its "Voter File." An expert with a contract with Calif has a copy of Calif's Voter File -- the very document Calif has refused to provide to DOJ or DHS. That expert has now relied on that Voter File to determine some number of names among the 20,000 given to California by DOJ are not in Calif's Voter File. That expert has submitted a declaration to that effect in litigation pending in D.C. Under the rules of discovery regarding expert witness testimony, DOJ is entitled to have its experts review any data or source materials relied upon by an expert for an opposing party. Not sure Calif and LA County were aware this expert was going to provide this declaration in a separate action pending in D.C. -- but now he has.
41
Jack Miller retweeted
𝘈𝘭𝘭 the Word of God appertains to some covenant, for God speaks 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 to man without the covenant. — Robert Rollock, A Treatise of God's Effectual Calling, 6
6
5
47
1,242
People want to know! Who writes and publishes more books per year? - Michael Horton - John Fesko 😆
1
1
5
486
Jack Miller retweeted
When God called Abraham, He was already looking beyond one man, one family, and one nation. “In you all the families of the earth will be blessed” (Genesis 12:3). That promise kept moving through Israel’s history until Scripture finally tells us where it was heading. Paul says the promise was spoken to Abraham and to his “seed,” and then adds plainly, “that is, Christ” (Galatians 3:16). Israel mattered because God chose that nation as the historical line through which the Messiah would come. The covenants, the promises, the law, and the patriarchs belonged to them, and “from whom is the Christ according to the flesh” (Romans 9:4–5). Yet the blessing was never meant to stop at Israel’s borders. This is what becomes so glorious in the gospel. The nations do not have to become ethnic Israel in order to receive Abraham’s blessing. Paul says, “those who are of faith are blessed with Abraham, the believer” (Galatians 3:9). Gentiles who were once “separate from Christ” and “strangers to the covenants of promise” have been brought near by His blood (Ephesians 2:12–13). Furthermore, the blessing promised to the nations is not vague prosperity or national success. It is reconciliation to God through Christ, justification by faith, the gift of the Spirit, and entrance into the people of God. “In Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles” (Galatians 3:14). The promise lands in a Person. And I must say, this should humble every nation. No people, culture, race, or civilization comes to Christ with something to boast about. We come as sinners needing mercy. From every tribe and tongue and people and nation, God is gathering a people for the Lamb (Revelation 5:9). So the nations are blessed through the promised Seed who came through Israel, Jesus Christ. And those who receive that blessing do what every redeemed sinner eventually learns to do gladly: bow before Him, confess Him as Lord, and give glory to the King who fulfilled the promise made long before any of us were born.
6
24
98
2,313
Jack Miller retweeted
Saved Outside the Covenant 1689 federalism dates the formal existence of the covenant of grace from the death of Christ. The Abrahamic covenant is assigned to another category: earthly promises, a mixed seed, a covenant in its own right. The Mosaic covenant likewise stands outside the covenant of grace as a legal administration superimposed on it. The dating generates a population problem. Ask under what covenant Adam was saved. The Adamic covenant supplies his condemnation: broken by the head, its curse administered on the race in real time, death reigning from Adam to Moses (Rom 5:14). For his salvation the scheme offers the covenant of grace "as revealed in the promise." A covenant revealed in promise is a covenant announced. It has not been cut. It constitutes no community, administers no benefits, gathers no one. Adam believes, and stands under no salvation covenant at all. Multiply Adam by forty centuries. Every believer before the new covenant lives under covenants the scheme itself defines as non-saving, awaiting a saving covenant the scheme dates after their deaths. The fathers are saved on the security of the Pactum Salutis, Christ's obedience credited proleptically, the former sins passed over in divine forbearance (Rom 3:25). The Pactum is an eternal ground. Administration requires a covenant in history. Between the eternal ground and the historical man, the scheme interposes a promise and a memorandum of forbearance. The result is an old world with a covenant basis for condemnation and no covenant basis for grace: the curse administered through a covenant in force, mercy administered around a covenant in waiting. Romans 5 forbids the asymmetry. Paul runs the two federal administrations in parallel grammar and parallel history: judgment through one trespass, free gift through one act of righteousness, death reigning, grace reigning. The gift in Paul is as covenantal, as located, as administered as the trespass. Kline resolved the difficulty at the level of covenant dating and covenant form. The covenant of grace commences at the protevangelium: Genesis 3:15 initiates the redemptive covenant in the aftermath of the broken covenant of works. Genesis 6:18 records its establishment — the verb is hēqîm, the upholding of a covenant already in existence, deployed at the crisis when the promise had reduced to one worshiping family. Genesis 15 cuts and constitutes the covenant community: marked with circumcision, carrying land and a seed as stars and sand. Abraham is the constitution of a community already under grace, never the founder of a parallel arrangement outside it. The covenant is one; its administrations are successive. Under that dating, the Pactum acquires its historical instrument from the first day of the fall: the eternal covenant's outcome is administered in time through the covenant of grace, Adam gathered in at its initiation, the fathers dying inside it (Heb 11), the new covenant arriving as its eschatological administration under the same federal Head. The fathers were saved inside the covenant because salvation has never been administered anywhere else. #1689Federalism #CovenantOfGrace #CovenantTheology #FederalHeadship #MGKline
2
1
1
9
1,172
Calvary OPC La Mirada, CA was blessed to receive two new members yesterday
1
12
524