Basic Geometry (@BasicGeometry) header
Basic Geometry (@BasicGeometry) profile picture

Providing the Core Geometric System ™, the essential framework for geometric understanding.

Szentendre
Joined April 2023
Photo by Basic Geometry (@BasicGeometry)Photo by Basic Geometry (@BasicGeometry)Photo by Basic Geometry (@BasicGeometry)Photo by Basic Geometry (@BasicGeometry)Photo by Basic Geometry (@BasicGeometry)Photo by Basic Geometry (@BasicGeometry)Photo by Basic Geometry (@BasicGeometry)Photo by Basic Geometry (@BasicGeometry)Photo by Basic Geometry (@BasicGeometry)Photo by Basic Geometry (@BasicGeometry)
The mathematical constant named pi is an artifact of a fundamentally flawed theoretical approximate. So are some other currently widely conventionally propagated formulas commonly referred to as Euclidean or specifically Archimedian. The CGS™ restores constructive geometry.
True computational efficacy using the Core Geometric System™. - 3.2radius² is the exact area of a circle. From that: - 3.2diameter is its exact circumference. - (√3.2r)³ is the exact volume of a sphere. - Base × height / √8 is the exact volume of a cone or pyramid. #cgs
2
1
102
That is a crucial clarification.
Replying to @gmac4247
So, what the mathematical constant pi really stands for is the expression n×sin(180°/n)<pi<n×tan(180°/n). With n approaching infinity, that is 3.14... But that is not the true circumference to diameter ratio; it's just a failed approximate of it. ... nitter.gq/BasicGeometry/status/2…
2
Basic Geometry retweeted
I have to set the record straight regarding an important detail. It doesn't fit into a single post, so it will be a short thread. It's a recurring issue, that some claim that I claim "pi=3.2". That is false. It's the same with the Indiana Pi Bill. ...
3.2radius² is the exact area of a circle. From that 3.2diameter is the exact circumference. Confirmed via measurements. The wise insist that can't be, because their theoretical circumscribed polygon limits it to about 3.14. Their polygon is not as circumscribed as they think.
1
1
1
13
Basic Geometry retweeted
Don't fall for this type of fraud. The true volume of a sphere equals the cubic value of the square root of its cross-sectional area — just like a cube —, which is about a third larger than the result of this worthless, primitive, exaggerated approximate. Measure it.
The sphere’s true volume is revealed by what remains after the cones are removed. Every horizontal slice of the sphere is a disk of radius √(r² − z²). The cylinder with its double cone subtracted leaves an annulus of outer radius r and inner radius |z|. Both areas equal π(r² − z²). Cavalieri’s principle therefore equates the volumes. Subtract the two cones from the cylinder: 2πr³ − 2·(⅓πr³) = ⁴⁄₃πr³. The sphere occupies exactly two-thirds of its enclosing cylinder. Geometry finds equality in the slices we choose to compare.
1
1
7
The arc intersects the sides of a concentric square at its quarters only if side/radius=4/√5, hence 3.2r² is the only true area balance ratio.
"Debunked..." My ass. It's much more like I have debunked the academic community as a bunch of degenerate liers and fraudsters. You just need to pull your heads out of their butts to see it.
1
1
35
The area of a circle from a different perspective. ⭕📐
3.2radius² is the exact area of a circle. From that 3.2diameter is the exact circumference. Confirmed via measurements. The wise insist that can't be, because their theoretical circumscribed polygon limits it to about 3.14. Their polygon is not as circumscribed as they think.
1
1
41
Basic Geometry has knowledge about suspected caller ID spoofing using its phone number. Take care. Spoofing is illegal if done with the intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of value. Violations can trigger significant civil penalties or criminal charges.
1
44
Basic Geometry retweeted
3.2radius² is the exact area of a circle. From that 3.2diameter is the exact circumference. Confirmed via measurements. The wise insist that can't be, because their theoretical circumscribed polygon limits it to about 3.14. Their polygon is not as circumscribed as they think.
3
1
2
3
169
Basic Geometry retweeted
This real-world example should make it clear why the pi is an artifact of a fundamentally flawed theoretical approximate. In case you missed the previous context: 3.2radius² is the exact area of a circle. The circumference can be derived from that algebraically as 6.4radius.
1
1
1
16
Basic Geometry retweeted
This made me really sad, @Google. I understand if you - don't understand what I wrote, - can't measure it, - don't care to measure it. But framing it as "debunked" is extremely disrespectful, and misleading. I'm doing my work mindfully. Please fix your end.
1
1
1
87
Basic Geometry retweeted
So basically the loving memory of David Hilbert and the Bourbaki Group stands between common sense and standard geometry.
🤖 Made with AI
3.2radius² is the exact area of a circle. (Fig. 1.) 3.2diameter is the circumference. (Pic.) Area/radius²=Circumference/diameter=3.2≈3.14≈π The mathematical constant π is an artifact of a fundamentally flawed theoretical approximate. (Fig. 2.)
1
1
29
This is a very important message. It's something to think about seriously.
I just finished an about 10 pages long refute of the pi today, and I asked the opinion of a chat bot about it. Here's a screenshot of the actual chat. It's funny in a way, but not really. The pi-propagandists are genuinely evil. They're messing up people's minds with that crap.
1
18
Basic Geometry retweeted
The backstory of these images is that I asked for geometry figures from an AI-assisted image generator. These ones failed, but I still find them beautiful. The team fixed it, so it gives accurate shapes now. Thanks. The downside is that there are no more like these coming up.
🤖 Made with AI
1
1
26
In the past few years I pinpointed several aspects of this. Or other aspects of the main point. There's no way to tell what comes from what. The relationships come as a whole. The point is that the mathematical constant pi is built on a series of flawed assumptions.
Fig.1. shows the flaw in the traditional approach of tangency. One point of vertical separation on a 3 point length is not what a curve looks like. (Fig.2.) Tangency is impossible under the traditional definitions. The mathematical constant pi is fundamentally flawed.
16
Pi approximation day is over. Area/radius²=Circumference/diameter ✅ "A/r²=C/d=π~3.14..." ❌ This is wrong. Corrected: A/r²=C/d=3.2~3.14~π ✅ Rationally: A/r²=C/d=3.2 ✅🪙 The mathematical constant named pi is an artifact of a fundamentally flawed theoretical approximate.
1
1
35
Area/radius²=Circumference/diameter=3.2≈3.14≈π
3.2radius² is the exact area of a circle. (Fig. 1.) 3.2diameter is the circumference. (Pic.) Area/radius²=Circumference/diameter=3.2≈3.14≈π The mathematical constant π is an artifact of a fundamentally flawed theoretical approximate. (Fig. 2.)
17
Basic Geometry retweeted
3.2radius² is the exact area of a circle. The mathematical constant named pi is an artifact of a fundamentally flawed theoretical approximate.
1
1
37
Basic Geometry retweeted
- 3.2radius² is the exact area of a circle. From that: - 3.2diameter is its exact circumference. - (√3.2r)³ is the exact volume of a sphere. - Base × height / √8 is the exact volume of a cone or pyramid. Geometry 16:5
1
1
52
Basic Geometry retweeted
3.2radius² is the exact area of a circle (Fig. 1.); 6.4radius is the circumference (Fig. 2., pic.); the mathematical constant named pi is an artifact of a fundamentally flawed theoretical approximate (Fig. 3.).
1
1
1
1
148
Replying to @RaminNasibov
The mathematical constant named pi.
1
1
34
The mathematical constant named pi is an artifact of a fundamentally flawed theoretical approximate. So are some other currently widely conventionally propagated formulas commonly referred to as Euclidean or specifically Archimedian. The CGS™ restores constructive geometry.
1
12
Basic Geometry retweeted
I'm not happy about it. It's not about changing the value of the pi; it's about replacing it by 3.2, since 3.2radius² is the exact area of a circle, 3.2diameter is the exact circumference, so the pi is an artifact of a fundamentally flawed theoretical approximate. Measure it.
1
1
117