CoJerry (@ColoradoJerrry) header
CoJerry (@ColoradoJerrry) profile picture

The last of a dying breed in Co. native, Mountain man, one with nature just want to be left alone. ideas and thoughts are those of a made up character

Commierado
Joined April 2024
Photo by CoJerry (@ColoradoJerrry)Photo by CoJerry (@ColoradoJerrry)Photo by CoJerry (@ColoradoJerrry)Photo by CoJerry (@ColoradoJerrry)Photo by CoJerry (@ColoradoJerrry)Photo by CoJerry (@ColoradoJerrry)Photo by CoJerry (@ColoradoJerrry)
CoJerry retweeted
An anti-hunting cabal has hijacked the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission and is racing against the clock to ram through more radical measures before @GovofCO Jared Polis (the man who packed the board with these extremists) leaves office in January. This is a scandal, #Copolitics, and an abuse of power that Governor-elect @pweiser must address before irreversible damage is done to the commission's already tarnished reputation. While the rest of Colorado focused on an election, a narrow bloc of commissioners began racing to lock in an anti-hunting agenda before Polis departs -- and before a number of them face full Senate confirmation. @rachelgabelco's reporting has documented the procedural chaos, ignored staff warnings, and the open disregard for process in a way that makes the pattern impossible to miss. At an October meeting, Commissioners Jessica Beaulieu, Rebecca Niemiec, Jack Murphy, Richard Reading, John Le Coq, and Chair Jay Tutchton ignored repeated requests from staff and @COParksWildlife Director Laura Clellan for additional time for stakeholder engagement and basic preparation. They ordered staff to produce a professional recommendation on the prairie-dog petition in just eight days. This was a deliberate compression of the process so the majority could force action on its preferred timeline. They then doubled down at the Nov. 3–4 meeting. The same Gang of Six voted to advance the citizen petition to end recreational shooting of prairie dogs on public lands toward final rulemaking in January, even after counsel raised concerns about the undefined “public lands” language. The meeting was so muddled that other commissioners had to intervene just to clarify which motions were live. The cabal's conduct clearly showed contempt for the process and the people in the room. Gang members were seen texting during the meeting. Commissioner Tai Jacober called out colleagues for smiling and smirking while rural stakeholders and county officials warned of the real-world consequences. Niemiec dropped a packet of 26 papers one minute before the meeting started, then cited one of her own silly "studies" to dismiss stakeholder engagement as a delay tactic. This fits a pattern with Niemiec, who introducing a phony "public opinion survey" finished the day before to justify slashing furbearer bag limits far below the alternatives that had been properly noticed for public comment. Sportsmen’s groups sued over that episode, alleging violations of the Administrative Procedures Act. The commissioners driving these actions do not appear to care that more lawsuits may follow. Five commissioners have not yet been confirmed by the Senate, yet are serving and voting. Some in the majority have said the quiet part out loud: they want to act now because they may not still be on the board under a new administration. Unconfirmed reports, also noted in Gabel’s coverage, claim Polis himself called at least one commissioner to urge a yes vote on the prairie dog petition. This raises ethics questions that deserve more press attention. CPW is designed to provide independent rulemaking. Direct political pressure, if it occurred, undercuts that structure and intent. Governor-elect Weiser already has said he is “frustrated” with the commission’s failure to listen to Western Slope communities and has indicated that better representation of real expertise and backgrounds matters. Seven of the 11 seats will be up for confirmation or reappointment next year. He should demand a full review of the rushed rulemakings, slow or reverse actions that bypassed normal process, and use the appointment and confirmation process to replace activists with commissioners who will manage wildlife based on science and stakeholder input. The clock is running out. The process has already been abused. Colorado’s wildlife does not belong to a temporary majority racing to lock in personal preferences before the governor leaves and the Senate finishes its work.
9
81
1
209
4,916
First off, that land generates nearly $130B in annual revenue. Secondly, intact ecosystems are literally mandatory for human survival.
Replying to @nateinthewild
There is no justification for all this land being off the tax rolls, this is a deficit eliminating issue
16
409
4
6,064
41,453
If someone dusts off this crappy 20 yr old graphic to convince you to sell public land, keep scrolling. An acreage tally tells you nothing about hunting access, migration corridors, or trout water the public could lose. It shows deep and almost profane ignorance on the issue:
Replying to @nateinthewild
There is no justification for all this land being off the tax rolls, this is a deficit eliminating issue
23
107
2
1,028
11,748
For generations, families across the West have made a living on lands they share with elk, mule deer, and other wildlife. Those livelihoods and the cultures they sustain helped make America what it is & are worth protecting. Datacenters do not have to be sited on public land.
Do you view cattle ranchers as some sort of cute culturally important relic to be preserved despite their marginal utility? I don't.
18
38
2
323
4,534
Yes, building AI data ctrs on federal land is an explicit Trump admin policy priority. The USGS report is an early step in carrying it out. It gives BLM maps and analysis to assess where data centers could be built alongside power infrastructure. Betrayal of Western rural people.
A recent federal report found 91.3 million acres of public lands — an area nearly the size of Montana — could be used for data centers. The Trump official overseeing most federal lands has tens of millions invested in the AI industry. propublica.org/article/burgu…
11
51
1
276
4,147
Muslim raider just destroyed the skeleton of the actual St. Nick.
BONES attributed to Saint Nicholas, Bishop of Myra, kept since 1098 in Saint-Nicolas-de-Port, in Meurthe-et-Moselle, were STOLEN from their reliquary inside the basilica, then DESTROYED. The suspect, arrested at his home, admitted to SMASHING the display case protecting the reliquary, then stealing its contents, BURNING the bones and CRUSHING them out of a “desire to destroy.” (Source: L'Est Républicain)
244
2,358
91
18,840
487,612
Oh well it's a good thing that the 'muh cost of living' people will see this and learn the error of their ways. If only the people who spent 2 years demoralizing the right had spent a few podcast episodes talking about this and how deportation helps reduce it, instead of crashing out about conspiracies
My jaw dropped when I read this... Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller says ICE asked the illegals they’ve detained if they were receiving Medicaid. HALF SAID THEY HAD BEEN SIGNED UP. The illegals that don’t have it say they just go to hospitals and it’s always 100% free. "What we found since President Trump came into office is that the Democrats have set up a system to funnel hundreds of billions and ultimately trillions of dollars to migrants that are in our country, oftentimes from places like Somalia. So as an example, ICE recently asked a group of illegal immigrants that were in detention, whether or not they were receiving Medicaid. Half of them raised their hands and volunteered that they were on Medicaid. They also asked how they pay their medical bills, and they said that if they don't have Medicaid, they go to hospitals, they get free care there, and they bill it to the taxpayers. So they aren't paying for any of their own healthcare in this country. — We've seen this over and over and over again."
8
12
1
175
4,890
so, the surgeon who worked hard, built a clinic, then a chain of clinics, and now has a private island, is he a good guy or a bad guy? you literally have no idea how wealth is created. the billionare who built a company that never sleeps is the one adding the value. you're still mired in marxist labor theory of value. the guy who made a billion inventing the heart valve the surgeon implants has provided far more value than any given surgeon who implanted it. "eat the rich" is a perfect shibboleth for the venn intersect of economic illiteracy and amoral greed.
When I say "eat the rich," I don't mean the surgeon with 700K in his bank account who had sleepless nights and worked hard for it. I mean the billionaires who earn 10K a minute even while they're asleep.
20
112
4
938
14,128
CoJerry retweeted
Not joking when I say the entire objective of AI-fear-mongering is to allow China to surpass the USA. No exaggeration whatsoever. The CCP is inside the Democratic party. They own elected representatives and leaders across the country, and they pay influencers, bot accounts, etc to fool Americans into shooting ourselves in the foot. If China wins AI, they will use it to destroy America. That’s not fear-mongering. They brag about it. It’s reality.
🚨 BREAKING: Texas Governor-Elect Gina Hinojosa requests pause on selling state land to Elon Musk.
199
870
51
5,830
96,377
CoJerry retweeted
WANTED: ICE issued a detainer for Eduardo Chacon Moreno a criminal alien from Mex. to the Denver Co. Jail. He has arrests for assault, dom. Battery, ID theft, dangerous drugs & trespassing. Denver did not honor the detainer and he is at large. If seen: ice.gov/tipline
36
195
13
479
8,277
To CO voters who supported A 87, believing it would deliver tax relief to those earning under $100,000: You also voted for likely double-digit electricity rates increases b/c utility tax rates went from 4.4% to 8.4%, a 91% increase. Who ultimately pays those utility taxes? Not shareholders. If you said ratepayers, give yourself a gold star! Since electricity is in everything, your tax relief will be gobbled up by higher utility bills and higher prices of all goods and services. If you voted for 87 and you claim to care about affordability, you are either lying or woefully uneducated on the consequences of higher taxes.
100
178
10
1,311
95,183
Ken - you guys spent money to primary good Republicans and lose seats Jarvis - I fundraised sooo good
1
6
70
1,468
Everyone in Colorado knows how much of a political piggy you are @RepCaldwell All eyes will be on you. Your finances will be dug through more than ever. Your connections will be uprooted. How the fuck you lose 6 races and think you should still be leader??
5
4
59
1,135
Voters just backed tougher fentanyl penalties (prop 132) and said no to boys in girls’ sports and irreversible surgeries on minors (props 134 & 135). @pweiser first move as governor-elect? Tell everyone the results need “a long, hard look” and that the legislature might need to make some “adjustments.” These are the same people who spent years calling anyone who questioned their policies fascists. Democracy is sacred… until the voters disagree with them. #DoBetterColorado #DoBetterPhil
The people who calls us fascists and yell about saving our democracy are trying to subvert the will of the people and disregard their votes
77
265
19
1,183
23,822
“I wish it need not have happened in my time,” said Frodo. "LMAO, well it has. Shut up and pull security," said Gandalf.
38
552
16
6,511
66,585
CoJerry retweeted
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
69,526
30,813
21,223
284,853
73,084,099
CoJerry retweeted
If Spencer Pratt is not some significant part of what comes next for conservatives. We are as stupid as those who sat out this election
12
42
826
9,968
You were one of the most vocal advocates for the disastrous choices that produced this result
Just checking in to see how things are goi--
103
850
3
19,938
130,815
CoJerry retweeted
Replying to @TRHLofficial
I’m mad about gas prices so I want to vote for the party that funded and facilitated the largest invasion in world history into the United States and the rape and murder if United States moms and daughters, anyway, how come no one is posting the numbers of refineries the democrats in California have forced closed the past 5 years?
1
18
370
An all-time performance. 🇺🇸 #WrestleAstana ‣ 9 medals - a new U.S. record ‣ 5 champions - a new U.S. record ‣ Snyder, Dake become five-time champions - only one American reached five-time status in men's freestyle before this year (Burroughs, 6x) ‣ Dake became the oldest World champion in U.S. history at age 35 ‣ 6 finalists - second most in U.S. history ‣ Team champs - sixth in U.S. men's freestyle history ‣ 42-6 combined record
11
84
9
477
22,515