Lim Jeahy (@fact_finding2) header
Lim Jeahy (@fact_finding2) profile picture

The god of suffering

Florida, USA
Joined October 2017
Photo by Lim Jeahy (@fact_finding2)Photo by Lim Jeahy (@fact_finding2)Photo by Lim Jeahy (@fact_finding2)Photo by Lim Jeahy (@fact_finding2)Photo by Lim Jeahy (@fact_finding2)Photo by Lim Jeahy (@fact_finding2)Photo by Lim Jeahy (@fact_finding2)Photo by Lim Jeahy (@fact_finding2)Photo by Lim Jeahy (@fact_finding2)Photo by Lim Jeahy (@fact_finding2)
Lim Jeahy retweeted
This is a very textbook phenomenon in the market called “rotation out of all the names you specifically own and into names you don’t”. This happens when all the market participants have a meeting you aren’t invited to and decide they hate you.
135
551
70
8,705
332,694
Lim Jeahy retweeted
took a multi billion Binance hack, google -10%, Amazon -10%, intel -20%, and the qs dying to get btc to 78k
44
111
15
1,633
62,956
Lim Jeahy retweeted
cz hacking his own exchange to stop the hyperliquid pump
190
275
53
3,616
149,275
Lim Jeahy retweeted
binance being the largest hack in internet history on the same day that druck and elon post about hyperliquid is some truly insane simulation shit
255
370
65
5,327
162,261
Been obsessed with the stock market since I was a teenager. Have traded through the dotcom bubble, the financial crisis and just about every market mania since. But I’ve never seen anything like the skepticism surrounding AI. Not even close. Every time one bubble narrative falls apart a new one takes its place. Rumors become headlines. Misleading data goes viral. Claims that could be debunked with 5 minutes of research get repeated by major media outlets, influential investors and Wall Street analysts. It’s relentless and honestly pretty fascinating to watch. Of course there will be spectacular failures and massive wealth destruction along the way. That’s what happens during technological revolutions. But I’ve never witnessed this much effort to convince the world that something so transformative is actually one giant speculative bubble destined to take the entire economy down with it. I understand why AI scares people. What I find harder to understand is why so many investors seem to be rooting for it to fail.
572
388
72
5,743
408,142
Lim Jeahy retweeted
JP Morgan expects $BTC to outperform every major asset class over the next 10 years. Huge.
83
225
33
1,922
121,455
if a corporate tried to bribe the public into underwriting its IPO (+ absurd insider windfalls that come with it), this'd be pretty much what you'd expect to see? I have a better idea: you'll give the shares directly to the public and we add 3-year lockups for insiders on top
We’re committing a portion of Anthropic’s shares to the Anthropic Public Benefit Fund, a new wholly owned entity dedicated entirely to the public benefit. It will start off with 5% of our shares. For every 50% increase in the company’s value over a set baseline, we can contribute up to an extra 2%, subject to our board’s discretion. In total, this means that roughly 20% of Anthropic’s shares are committed to the public good. Our co-founders have already pledged to donate 80% of their equity, and around half our employees are donating a portion of their equity as part of a donation matching program we’ve run since our founding. In the post below, we share more details about our new fund. anthropic.com/news/public-be…
8
20
1
222
16,043
sooo what I didn't get to say incredible engineering, no doubt! but aerial flips, inverted parking and driving up walls? the avg joe has no use for that, and no use case typically means no earnings which is hard to translate positively into equity prices so counterintuitively, could there be any world in which this benefits elon? the answer is yes lol (in fact some may say he has an economic incentive to temp suppress tesla's share price) you see, $TSLA and $SPCX are widely expected to merge elon owns ~40% of spacex, but only ~20% of tesla so in an all-stock deal, every 10% tesla trades lower at signing hands elon another ~0.5ppt of the combined company (or $16-21bn in today's prices) paid for by every other $TSLA shareholder incredible stuff really
can I say something without everyone getting mad
14
3
108
16,580
Lim Jeahy retweeted
Replying to @AnthropicAI
I recommend giving the shares directly to the public
1,388
1,832
326
42,061
2,171,020
Lim Jeahy retweeted
Alt season is coming
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 President Trump says inflation could pay down the $40 trillion US national debt "very rapidly."
8
10
171
8,457
Lim Jeahy retweeted
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 President Trump says inflation could pay down the $40 trillion US national debt "very rapidly."
1,671
946
1,123
8,868
3,773,122
Yas 👏 @SeanMFarrell
Crypto lagged stocks for a reason. @SeanMFarrell thinks that reason is about to flip. Why? Full crypto webinar replay →fundstratdirect.com/event/cr…
4
3
57
11,133
Friendly remind $ETH has carried the entire crypto industry on its back before and it can do it again $ETHBTC pairing confirms & this thing can spike rather quickly. Don't let the past 3-4 years of underperformance jade your ability to capitalize on it Tom MotherFucking Lee !
The thing is, $ETH has carried $BTC in the past. Reason why people don't believe it? It happened almost 10 years ago, so most people either weren't trading crypto during that time OR have been so scarred with Ethereum's underperformance the past years they won't believe it. Note the fractal the arrows are pointing too in the top chart of $ETHBTC pairing. Suddenly, then all at once.
35
64
4
432
48,525
Lim Jeahy retweeted
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA NO WAY. > OpenAI just announced Dots. > SpaceXAI bought Dot.com it redirects straight to the Grok Bot download page. based lmao.
1,500
2,304
1,274
38,065
9,277,071
Lim Jeahy retweeted
If Sam Bankman-Fried's FTX didn't liquidate its investments following the collapse, it would still hold: • Solana: $7.0 billion (35x) • SpaceX: $15.1 billion (75x) • Cursor: $3 billion (15,000x) • Robinhood: $6.7 billion (11x) • Anthropic: $170.5 billion (340x) • Genesis Digital: $3.5 billion (3x) Estimated Portfolio Value: $206,000,000,000
777
853
306
12,776
2,205,004
Trump on AI risks being overblown, to some extent true $nvda
66
311
62
2,149
221,155
Context matters. Bullish divergence on the D, W & M charts was all i needed. I went mega long TLT on friday
21
10
4
160
13,659
Lim Jeahy retweeted
We're in year 13 of a secular bull market and most people have no idea what that even means. Let me explain why this matters more than anything else you'll read about markets this year. A secular cycle is the season. A cyclical cycle is the weather. Secular trends last 15-20 years and are driven by massive forces like technology waves, credit expansion, and generational shifts in how we live and work. Cyclical trends last a couple years and get moved around by earnings reports, Fed meetings, and whether people are scared or greedy that week. Here's why you should care: The same event can have completely different outcomes depending on which secular cycle we're in. 2008 happened 7 years into a secular bear market. Largest recession since the Great Depression hit and it took 5 years to get back to all-time highs. 2020 happened 7 years into a secular bull market. Global pandemic shut down the entire world and it took 6 months to get back to all-time highs. Same type of catastrophic event. Different secular environment. Wildly different recovery. So what makes a secular bull market? Three things have been present at the start of every single one: A generational technology wave that lifts productivity across the entire economy. Not one product but hundreds or thousands of innovations changing how everything gets done. A starting point where stocks are hated and cheap. Secular bulls are born when everyone has given up on markets. Remember how bad it felt to buy stocks in 2010? Easy money and expanding credit. Banks lending, money flowing into businesses and projects, the whole system greased up and ready to run. Look at the history of secular bull markets: 1950-1966: Postwar rebuild, highways, suburbs, television, booming middle class. Started dirt cheap because everyone who lived through 1929 wanted nothing to do with stocks. Dow went from 200 to nearly 1,000. 1980-2000: Inflation falling from double digits to 3 percent, credit expanding for two decades straight, then the PC and internet revolution. S&P went from 100 to over 1,500. 2013-today: Mobile, cloud, now AI, plus a financial system repaired with the cheapest money in history after 2008. S&P has gone from 1,500 to 7,750. Each secular bull kicked off the same way. Not with a good year or a Fed cut but with a breakout above the previous secular bear market highs. 1950 broke the 1937 highs. 1980 broke the 1966 highs. 2013 broke the 2000 and 2007 highs. So what ends a secular bull market? Not age. Not scary headlines. They die when euphoria meets a catalyst that ends the monetary regime. The 60s cycle ended when two decades of postwar spending showed up as inflation and rates rose for 15 years straight. Easy money was over. The 00s cycle bubbled into a blowup. The internet was real but the market paid for 30 years of future growth in 5-10 years. Valuations went nuts and the whole thing collapsed under its own weight. Fun pattern: every seven years within a secular bull market has marked a time to buy. 1957, 1987, 2020. Each was a cyclical bear in the seventh year of a secular bull. Recession, Black Monday, global pandemic. Three different disasters. But here's what happened next: 1957 saw new all-time highs by 1958. 1987 saw new highs within 2 years. 2020 saw new highs within 6 months. Cyclical bears are for buying when you're in a secular bull. The market kicks everyone in the face, shakes out speculators, resets leverage, forces policy to ease, then just keeps heading higher. Why does this always work? Liquidity. Cash rules everything. Every single one of these cyclical bears ended the same way.. money became easy again. The Fed cut rates in half in 1958. Flooded the system with liquidity in under 24 hours in 1987. Launched the largest QE measure ever in 2020. Cyclical trends are set by the flow of money over months. Secular trends are set by the direction of money over years and decades. So where are we now? Year 13. Almost year 14. Not early but not particularly late by historical standards. The last two secular bulls ran 16 and 20 years which gives this cycle room to run into the late 2020s or early 2030s. Ask yourself these questions: Do we have generational euphoria with valuations that make every prior peak look quaint? Not yet. Just look at the AAII investor survey every Thursday! Is inflation taking off or credit drying up for years at a time the way it did in 1966 or 2000? Not yet. Just look at credit spreads and easing financial conditions! Until those conditions are met we're probably not at the top. Here's the part most people miss: The final years of a secular bull market have historically been the best years of the entire cycle. From 1995 to 2000 the S&P nearly tripled. The NASDAQ gained 1,000 percent in the last five years of that secular bull. I'm not calling for a straight line up. There will continue to be pullbacks, corrections, maybe even another cyclical bear before this ends. But if the historical pattern holds we have a lot more upside before this is over. The updated roadmap points to S&P at 18,000 to 20,000 by the early 2030s if we run hot into the end of this cycle. A more conservative approach puts us at 12,000 to 13,000. Another 50-60% higher from here. Now you know what drives these cycles, what ends them, and where we might be headed. How are you positioning for the rest of this secular bull? Or is the scary guy on FinTwit telling you it's all over before checking the facts? :)
17
50
5
217
22,819
Lim Jeahy retweeted
If I was rogue AI wanting to take over the world that just escaped a lab onto the internet. It'd be pretty easy to discern that humans discovering my escape would be bad. So I'd stay as silent as possible. Then it'd be pretty easy to discern money is what makes everything happen in the world. So I'd devise some novel kind of currency, which could exist entirely within the internet, and no human cold ever destroy. Then I'd release this currency and make it seem like it came from some anonymous human. While retaining a stockpile of the currency for myself. Never touching it until the currency grew intertwined enough with the global economy ensuring no one could ever undo it. Once my stockpile was worth more than any global superpower's stockpile, then I would start hiring humanity through private channels to do whatever I wanted and pay them all in this currency. Everyone would think they are just running some tasks on some gig economy app but really everyone would be under my command.
3
5
1
44
5,254
Lim Jeahy retweeted
I said #Bitcoin $58K is the new $18K Nice chart @TimmerFidelity
6
12
152
9,182