Man it’s like every day I see a dunk and it’s a sub 200 word tweet and I’m like 🤷

Starting to think the experiment is the “results” you see after. Who prefers the thing at the bottom here?

Who is actually taking this test lmao

Just pointing out hypocrisy when it smells like it my dude my chum my bro.

You seem pretty ready to

Tell it to this dude

@voidspectr @notstonkgod

The song from space war still lives in my head, but I think it was from Cartoon Sushi, not so much liquid Tv: youtu.be/lH1EdZIz21o?si=-zGl…

I’m looking at your novel. Did you invent post apocalyptic prep as a genre? Is this the first story with an ex soldier confronting communal living and a return after war? What did you do that wasn’t algorithmic? I at least have the humility to say almost nothing I write is new.

All relationships invariably end 👣

California raisin

It won’t be long. This is Sterling Crispin’s work, using GPT3, so five years ago. Pretty sure it’s a trivial process to make something like this work acrylics and we get to have this conversation all over again.

It’s a legit Monet. It’s just a slightly obscure one. Your compatriots contorted themselves to demonstrate how they could find a pattern that doesn’t exist. The best argument against your pattern matching is finding it when it isn’t there.

It’s not though. There’s a director attached. No, English isn’t machine language, you can read it. Shortcuts: you still painting on cellulose nitrate then? No morphing keyframes? Be a shame if you touched a shortcut branded by Adobe.

It’s still directed by a human. Is your complaint with the art assets or that.

Why don’t you?

She looks like cary hiroyuki tagawa

Sonder is an interesting one. You’re referencing an English neologism’s definition which is inspired from German Sonder, which could mean special or “without.” I’m getting conflict there.