You can model an LLM as a deterministic function, which is obvious if you knew what you were talking about. And physicists engines can use stochastic particle systems, obvious to anyone who knew what they were talking about. Thanks though glad to be proven right.

He’s talking about AI, you bots need to read

How’s it feel to be so aggressively stupid? Hahaha.

What’s the obvious difference because I don’t think you know what you’re talking about.

“I’m buying the game to review tank it, I’m supporting the developers!”

You really are retarded. He’s talking about AI. He’s quoting Tim Sweeney Jesus

We finally have a tool for little creators and hobbyists and you guys think it’s a corpo position because you can’t stop yourselves from down ranking the hobbyist creations for your gay ideological signaling. More Reddit leftwing fag shit

You guys really are the dumbest people imaginable. It’s in relation to fraudulent reviews, you Reddit fag.

You can tell him we saw the messages, that’s why he sent them right? For the tweet?

To what degree? When Pixar builds a physics engine for a movie, and it does all the simulations is that human intelligence or math? This “concern” is performative social posturing garbage. You didn’t care before “now”

I’m working on a 30 year old game that had a studio to build, using AI to update and remake it. These people are crazy, why would I be able to do this by myself?

Rights have to be used responsibly; if you’re posting fraudulent reviews because you never tried a thing of course you lose the right. You missed the point above.

You’re right. You can still down rate things you’ve never tried. Provide fraudulent reviews. You just lose the argument though.

I get your brain is broken, but reread the point. People leaving negative reviews without trying the product. Would it make sense for people to tank reviews on your art without viewing it?

I love it, preach on 🙏

And not all “AI use” is equivalent if I even remotely entertain the “ethical” non concerns: if I make all my art assets on local models there’s no environmental argument. Your informed consumers aren’t stating that nuance.

What kind of informed decision are they making, and what consumer knowledge do they have that’s guiding it? “I don’t want to consume art made with stable diffusion” shouldn’t dictate industry labeling.

You lose the right when you’re intentionally down rating the GMO food without trying it. When your friends stop trying to weaponized it then transparency has a point

We tried this in California. Everything is labeled as a potential carcinogen. No one cares except people with unmanaged anxiety disorders.

Guy should have been more vague and not explained any of it. Let her puzzle it out. I told a girl one time “I’m not the kind of guy for you” and left it there. It fucked her up for a week until she begged we go out. You leave the room for then to get lost in their head.