$Pi miner since 2021 @PiCoreTeam
Moon
Joined December 2020
- Tweets117K
- Following3.5K
- Followers2.1K
- Likes138K
Crypto Archangel 𝝅 retweeted
This is the problem with cheating on the front end (early votes) as opposed to the old "stop the count at 3AM" trick. You have to guess at how many fake votes to shove into the system, and you end up with results that look ludicrous...like your example.
Crypto Archangel 𝝅 retweeted
Bo French got more votes for Texas Railroad Commissioner than Paxton did for Senate…
🔴French - 4,426,545 (+176,793)
🔴Paxton - 4,249,752
He also matched Abbott’s vote share.
Crypto Archangel 𝝅 retweeted
See, this is the problem with trying to cheat on the front end (early voting) rather than with the "3AM water main break" trick.
You end up with results that look ridiculous, because you don't know how many votes you'll need ahead of time.
Crypto Archangel 𝝅 retweeted
Elon is owning the commie Democrats.
Exactly 😂
Tesla has no government contracts and President Trump ended federal incentives for electric vehicles.
SpaceX contracts with the government are BOTH the best product AND the lowest price! Moreover government revenue will be less than 10% of SpaceX revenue this quarter and less then 5% a year from now.
Happy to cancel any that the government doesn’t want. Just say the word!
Crypto Archangel 𝝅 retweeted
I ran the numbers.
With the exception of Ken Paxton*, Texas Republican midterm statewide candidates slightly outperformed historical expectations.
Democrats UNPRECEDENTEDLY outperformed them.
Prior to 2026, it was rare for a statewide race candidate to outperform the presidential candidate of two years prior.
In 2026, EVERY SINGLE STATEWIDE CANDIDATE obtained more raw votes than Kamala Harris.
This has never happened before.
Methods.
I asked: What average % of the presidential vote does each Texas statewide race candidate get in the midterms, for each party?
Then I compared what each candidate was expected to get, based on historical trends since 1992**, to what they actually got in 2026.
The present figure is after adjusting for which party had a president in office; midterm turnout is on average higher for parties who lost the presidency.
The unadjusted version is in the next, threaded post, for completeness.
* Paxton would have lost even if he had performed at slightly above historical expectation, as other Republican candidates had, as you can see in the right-hand figure.
** Texas and national politics worked very differently before the 1990s, with many conservatives voting Republican for president and Democrat for state office. They are not comparable.
Crypto Archangel 𝝅 retweeted
America was founded on Christian principles, and no amount of rewriting history will ever erase that.
We are a CHRISTIAN NATION.
Crypto Archangel 𝝅 retweeted
Texans need to be more outraged
This wasn’t by happenstance. This was a planned coup by ballot
You can’t add millions. of brand new voters who aren’t verified American citizens and think you can get away with it
start speaking out more and more
🚨Wow, more data major red flags from the midterm numbers are developing:
The narrative that Republicans failed to turn out is false. The vote totals show Republicans performed right in line with their usual midterm participation and actually picked up additional support compared to the last midterm.
Rough House vote comparison:
Republicans
2022: 54.2 million
2026: roughly 55.6 million
Net increase: 1.4 million
Democrats
2022: 51.3 million
2026: roughly 70 million
Net increase: 19 million
Republican turnout stayed at typical midterm levels and edged higher. The idea that they stayed home is a complete lie and fabricated.
What stands out is the Democratic side: they added about 19 million more votes than in 2022, reaching numbers closer to a presidential election. The open question is where those extra votes came from and why were so many citizenship not verified.
And it's not in just one or two states. This is starting to show up in several states.
Story is developing....
Crypto Archangel 𝝅 retweeted
Senators in 12 states with more registered voters than citizen voting-age population.
Crypto Archangel 𝝅 retweeted
Obrigado, mas não tem Xadrez 4D. Há simplesmente a mesma tática de sempre do movimento nacional populista no mundo inteiro. Se fala verdades na mídia tradicional, que tenta te difamar e assim você passa a ser pautado e gera polêmica. É exatamente isso que está sendo feito.
O Paulo Figueiredo obviamente sabe de coisas que nós não sabemos, e são exatamente essas coisas que definem se entrevistas a mídias de esquerda são uma boa ideia ou não.
Se você parar pra pensar, qualquer americano de direita que lê uma matéria do NYT já franze a testa ciente do viés. Boas chances dele pesquisar sobre o tema em uma fonte confiável e esbarrar na verdade.
Eu escolho confiar - sem criar expectativas.
Crypto Archangel 𝝅 retweeted
🚨 Anyone else in Texas who voted Republican in the midterms find “TEH” written on their ballot? VERY STRANGE. 👇
Crypto Archangel 𝝅 retweeted
🚨AZ Election News: Newly discovered 2026 vote result's algorithm below needs indepth evaluation.
CYBER Expert Mark Cook comments below:
"It might be good intentioned, but... Please, just do that math yourselves, before believing the pretty graphs📈you will be shown over the next weeks. You all might want to take a closer look.🔍 It is not a perfect "one formula fits all" or "exactly the same 15% everywhere." Variation exists (Look at Texas...a clear outlier on the low side for Republicans; many other races also deviate)." - via @PatriotMarkCook
We have one chance to get this right!!
Read: Mark Cook just posted this about the supposed cheat⬇️⬇️ nitter.gq/PatriotMarkCook/status…
@ParikhClay @ZoomWalter @AzPinkLady
@CletaMitchell @BlehmLawAZ @realAlexKolodin @azjustinheap @WethePeopleAZA1 @AzRepGillette @dojfrauddiv @MSG_Jack_Dona @Only1Trickster @MichaelKav777 @JeffClarkUS @Rach_IC @PeterTicktin @ChrisHandsel @potus
THE 15% BAND
Look at this chart.
59 races. Senate and governor.
States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024.
The solid lines are 2024.
The dashed lines are 2026.
The shaded bands are what moved.
One formula fits all of it:
Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024
Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024
For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side.
The numbers:
Senate: Republicans kept ~85% of Trump’s share
Governor: ~86%
Variation explained: 88%
What makes it strange:
It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero.
The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races.
Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853.
Why seats flipped:
At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped.
What this means:
Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere.
A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out.
The numbers raise the question.
The ballots can answer it.
Crypto Archangel 𝝅 retweeted
ALGORITHMS
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible??
All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans
Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm
Our elections are fake
Crypto Archangel 𝝅 retweeted
All 15 Texas statewide midterm races from 2018 to 2026.
Consistent Republican votes.
Consistent Democrat votes.
That was true even in 2018 among Democrats, when Trump was very unpopular.
Then, suddenly...
Crypto Archangel 𝝅 retweeted
TEXAS: THE 15% GAP, COUNTY BY COUNTY
The 15% gap held across the Senate map. Here’s Texas, all 254 counties. 97% of counties fell within range: 246 of the 254.
Below the formula: Starr, Zapata, Maverick, Webb, Hidalgo, Cameron, Duval, Jim Hogg. Border counties along the Rio Grande.
What the formula tells us: If a county is below the formula, the proportion of Democrats to Republicans who voted 🗳️ in that specific county was higher than in 2024. If it’s above the formula, the proportion of Republicans to Democrats was higher than in 2024.
Why this matters:
This isn’t a statewide average hiding the normal county-to-county variation underneath. The same 15% shows up in counties with dozens of voters and counties with more than a million. The few that break from it break in predictable directions.
One rule works at the state level and the county level. That’s not what scattered voter decisions usually look like.
Crypto Archangel 𝝅 retweeted
Every new thing that comes out about this election looks more like fraud than the last one
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible??
All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans
Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm
Our elections are fake